X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28
  1. #1
    Join Date
    15th November 15
    Location
    West Yorkshire
    Posts
    130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    kilt length critique...

    Hi

    I have been experimenting with the length (the drop?) of a PV kit I own but don't seem to have the length right - or is it just me being over critical? In both photos my kilt sits about one inch above my navel.

    My first photo (wearing the PC) the kilt measures 23.5 inch, which I think is too long for me. As I said, I was experimenting and had the hem raised (sacrilege I know but it was only a cheap kilt), to 22 inch, which I now think too short. That's the second photo I posted. What do you think about each length?

    Can I also ask for a general critique of both outfits? Ideally, I would like an Argyll jacket and waist coat but can't afford one at the moment so I made do with a tweed herringbone jacket and waist coat in the Saxon style that I already have.

    PS: In the second photo, I was wearing my kilt to an evening meal (not a black tie event), so I wore my dress sporran rather than my usual black leather one. I've also now bought red flashes and red tie to wear instead of green tie and Gunn tartan flashes.

    Sorry but both photos are a little dark so you can't see the tartan properly... it's Gunn Modern

    pic1.jpg

    12247136_532401606918141_4230297424658096952_n.jpg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    28th May 13
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    3,014
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The second photo looks better to me....half way in between the 2 would be my choice.
    "Good judgement comes from experience, and experience
    well, that comes from poor judgement."
    A. A. Milne

  3. The Following 4 Users say 'Aye' to Liam For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    Join Date
    15th November 15
    Location
    West Yorkshire
    Posts
    130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Liam View Post
    The second photo looks better to me....half way in between the 2 would be my choice.
    that's what I thought too. some where around 22.5 or 23 inch

  5. #4
    Join Date
    10th December 06
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    14,351
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think the second photo is better, we all started somewhere, when you can, get an Argyll jacket and you'll be set. You might want to look at the 1 kilt 10 looks thread if you have not already.

    http://www.xmarksthescot.com/forum/f...-attire-46888/

  6. The Following 4 Users say 'Aye' to McMurdo For This Useful Post:


  7. #5
    Join Date
    18th July 07
    Location
    North East Scotland
    Posts
    1,027
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Definitely the second.
    Alan

  8. #6
    Join Date
    5th August 14
    Location
    Oxford, Mississippi
    Posts
    4,756
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I agree with the "more knee" second photo. I find with my own kilt, that I like the extra movement when walking with the kilt higher. I think just touching the top of the knee cap is preferred for many that have nervous energy and tend to move around a lot.
    A 22.5 drop may be your best number.

  9. #7
    Join Date
    13th March 05
    Location
    Victoria, British Columbia, Canada (OCONCAN)
    Posts
    3,809
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's hard to tell from the picture, but I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that the length in the second picture is still a little too long for my preference. I think the longer jacket has the effect of lessening the amount of kilt showing, so maybe it makes the kilt look shorter than it is?
    "Touch not the cat bot a glove."

  10. The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to Macman For This Useful Post:


  11. #8
    Join Date
    13th May 05
    Location
    Native Texan, now located in W. KY/TN
    Posts
    1,000
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The first photo is foreshortened (a term used by we illustrator/artist types), so the kilt length appears longer than it actually is. The second photo shows the true length, which looks correct.
    My Clans: Guthrie, Sinclair, Sutherland, MacRae, McCain-Maclachlan, MacGregor-Petrie, Johnstone, Hamilton, Boyd, MacDonald-Alexander, Patterson, Thompson. Welsh:Edwards, Williams, Jones. Paternal line: Brandenburg/Prussia.
    Proud member: SCV/Mech Cav, MOSB. Camp Commander Ft. Heiman #1834 SCV Camp.

  12. The Following User Says 'Aye' to Mike S For This Useful Post:


  13. #9
    Join Date
    21st September 15
    Location
    Leslie Michigan USA
    Posts
    199
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I agree with the majority, second pic looks better. If it is a little short could you loose the waist and let it ride a little lower? "Split the difference" so to speak.

  14. #10
    Join Date
    28th April 13
    Location
    SE QLD, Australia
    Posts
    1,528
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The length in the second one looks about right to me - certainly don't go more than an extra half inch. Might depend how it lies when you sit.

    What does your fine lady think?
    Regards, Sav.

    "The Sun Never Sets on X-Marks!"

  15. The Following User Says 'Aye' to WillowEstate For This Useful Post:


Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0