-
29th August 06, 04:49 PM
#1
You know...
I'm starting this thread so each of us can share obscure but (possibly) interesting facts that may not be widely known. I'll go first.
In another thread, someone posted a picture of a guy wearing a kilt with his western shirt, broad-brimmed hat, and cowboy boots. After much discussion, the concensus was that cowboy boots are worn with the pants leg out, not tucked in, and therefore such footwear was inappropriate for wear with a kilt.
As a member of the TV generation, many of my early memories are of Roy Rogers, Sky King, and other Hollywood cowboys doing their Saturday morning action/western/adventure thing while mom, from the kitchen, admonished us kids "Don't sit too close to the Tee-Vee! You'll get square eyes!"
In the afternoons when I'd go outside and play with my little friends, whether cowboys wore their pants-legs tucked in or hanging out was an issue of utmost importance. The True Cowoy Way was especially urgently debated by those of us with real, live, cowboy boots. Some argued that only one way was correct, but the position one took on the pants-in-or-out controversy was usually based on who his favorite cowboy was. You had a thorny path to tread if you ever noticed that your personal favorite wore his both ways (just not at the same time). If you tried to take the "either way is fine" position, you were likely to be branded a coward who lacked strong convictions. You tried to stay out of the debate in this case.
Many years later, the Cowboy Boot Controversy still puzzled me, but since I wasn't such an ardent fan of westerns anymore, it did not concern me overmuch. A few years ago, however, I finally got my chance to learn the truth, and it surprised me.
I was living in Clovis, New Mexico at the time. Clovis was not only an old (read ~100 years) railroad town, but still had quite a few cowboys working the ranches and feed lots in the surrounding countryside. I had noticed that some of the cowboys I saw were wearing their pants legs tucked into their boot tops, while others wore their pants legs outside the boot. I decided to ask on of them, and here's the answer:
BOTH ways are correct!
It all depends on what you're going to be doing that day whether you wear the pants leg in or out. If you're going to be working on the range, in the brush and weeds, you leave the pants leg out. That way, burrs, foxtails, and other debris don't fall into your boots and make your life, at least temporarily, miserable. If you're going to be working the stockyards or feedlots, on the other hand, you tuck your pants legs in. Why? Because you're gonna be walking in ankle-deep (or deeper) cow exhaust at some point during the day, and it's so much easier to get the stuff off of leather than out of denim.
So there you have it!
My opinion regarding cowboy boots and the kilt? Maybe with ropers. High heels of any sort just look odd on a man in a skirt.
~~SSgt Baloo
-
-
29th August 06, 04:57 PM
#2
If you're wearing a skirt, high heels is expected of the wearer. Kilts on the other hand.....
-
-
29th August 06, 05:25 PM
#3
If I saw a guy in a kilt & cowboy boots, I'd wonder if he was from Islay or Kintyre... You know, western Scotland. :rolleyes:
.
Happiness? I'd settle for being less annoyed!!!
"I used to be disgusted; now I try to be amused." - Declan MacManus
Member of the Clan Donnachaidh Society
-
-
29th August 06, 06:02 PM
#4
I wear my western boots with kilts all the time, and it looks quite good. They are roper/packers, shorter than traditional cowboy boots and lace up, but with a traditional western toe.
Unfortunately, I cannot seem to find any pics that show my feet.
-
-
29th August 06, 11:28 PM
#5
 Originally Posted by Southern Breeze
If you're wearing a skirt, high heels is expected of the wearer. Kilts on the other hand..... 
A kilt is a masculine skirt. If you're wearing a kilt with heels, however, you might as well be wearing a poodle skirt.
I'm just sayin'.
-
-
30th August 06, 08:34 AM
#6
Pants tucked into boots, or pants over top of the boots, neither changes the fact that cowboy boots and a kilt don't look good and you run the risk of being mistaken for Patsy Cline
-
-
30th August 06, 10:27 AM
#7
 Originally Posted by Colin
Pants tucked into boots, or pants over top of the boots, neither changes the fact that cowboy boots and a kilt don't look good and you run the risk of being mistaken for Patsy Cline

I'd imagine that a kilt could look pretty darned good, though, while line-dancing. Especially one with a high swish factor. :rolleyes:
-
-
30th August 06, 11:15 AM
#8
Last edited by Panache; 30th August 06 at 11:29 AM.
-See it there, a white plume
Over the battle - A diamond in the ash
Of the ultimate combustion-My panache
Edmond Rostand
-
-
30th August 06, 12:04 PM
#9
I've noticed that in east Texas the pants generally get tucked in when it rains. I'm still waiting for that to happen.
-
-
30th August 06, 12:22 PM
#10
Panache, that kilt would look so much better with rhinestones on it!
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks