X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25
  1. #1
    Join Date
    11th September 14
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    21
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Waistcoat...no belt?

    Hey there - quick question for the forum.

    I'm going kilted to a wedding this afternoon and will be wearing a dress shirt and waistcoat (no jacket) with the kilt. Does wearing a waistcoat mean I should leave the belt at home?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    5th August 11
    Location
    Austin,Texas
    Posts
    1,077
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't claim to be an authority, but whenever I wear a waistcoat I don't wear a belt.

  3. The Following 5 Users say 'Aye' to cck For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    Join Date
    11th September 14
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    21
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah - I'm leaning that way too. Thanks for your advice.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    24th September 04
    Location
    Victoria, BC Canada 48° 25' 47.31"N 123° 20' 4.59" W
    Posts
    4,347
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Belt - no belt - thing is an just old school, guy dressing thing. I was taught when I was young that you do not wear a belt with a vest or waistcoat. I was taught that you wore suspenders/braces when you wear a vest/waistcoat.

    But then I was also taught that you never take off your jacket and wear a vest alone. I was taught that if the vest has the satin back and adjuster then it was proof that the vest was not designed to be outerwear.

    There are many of these old school things. I was taught that if your vest has a straight bottom, and was single breasted, you left the bottom button undone. If your vest has the points at the bottom, the points were a simulation of the bottom button being left undone so you did up all the buttons.
    This apparently comes from King George VII who was a rotund man and could not get the bottom vest buttons done up so left the bottom of his vests gaping open and the rest of us followed along.

    This same old school teaching is what I still do for the most part. It is what I learned so it is what I am most comfortable with.

    Today, all over the internet, you will see vests and belts worn together. If you choose to follow what has become widely accepted no one can say you are wrong.
    Steve Ashton
    Forum Owner

  6. The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to Steve Ashton For This Useful Post:


  7. #5
    Join Date
    11th September 14
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    21
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wow! That is really interesting - I hadn't heard that history before. Perhaps my best plan is to just get dressed and see how it all looks with/without a belt and go from there.
    Thanks for your help.

  8. #6
    Join Date
    28th May 13
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    3,014
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    For those of us who wear sporran hangers, rather than a sporran belt, a kilt belt is necessary even when wearing a vest.
    "Good judgement comes from experience, and experience
    well, that comes from poor judgement."
    A. A. Milne

  9. The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to Liam For This Useful Post:


  10. #7
    Join Date
    26th January 14
    Location
    Charlotte NC
    Posts
    147
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Greetings from Reddit. I hope you find your answer.

  11. The Following User Says 'Aye' to cookingkilted For This Useful Post:


  12. #8
    Join Date
    13th May 05
    Location
    Native Texan, now located in W. KY/TN
    Posts
    1,000
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've seen the vest worn with and without a belt with equal frequency. We wore a belt when donned in vests and shirtsleeves in most pipe bands that I was affiliated with years ago. Not that one should go by that when dictating your own kit by any means.

    Personally I prefer the vest to be worn WITHOUT a belt, particularly those sporting the large, rectangular plate buckles. Doubly so now that I'm a fat guy with a gut. No need to draw extra attention to the fact with a bright shiny target right at ground zero!
    Last edited by Mike S; 20th June 15 at 02:54 PM.
    My Clans: Guthrie, Sinclair, Sutherland, MacRae, McCain-Maclachlan, MacGregor-Petrie, Johnstone, Hamilton, Boyd, MacDonald-Alexander, Patterson, Thompson. Welsh:Edwards, Williams, Jones. Paternal line: Brandenburg/Prussia.
    Proud member: SCV/Mech Cav, MOSB. Camp Commander Ft. Heiman #1834 SCV Camp.

  13. #9
    Join Date
    18th October 09
    Location
    Orange County California
    Posts
    11,124
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Whether one wears a belt under their waistcoat or not is of no consequence to their appearance as long as nobody sees it.

    I've seen hundreds, maybe thousands, of vintage photos of men in kilts and what you never see is a belt visible under the waistcoat.

    Of course we can't know if it's because they weren't wearing one, or that their waistcoat was long enough and the kilt's top and the belt high enough so that it can't be seen.

    The fact that vintage Highland Dress catalogues refer to the belt as the Dirk Belt, and talk of it as being worn to support a dirk (but not otherwise) makes me think that the idea of wearing a dirk belt under a waistcoat in order to attempt to support an ill-fitting kilt is recent.

    Here's what happens when you combine a kilt that's far too short, and a waistcoat that's far too short, and a belt.



    Here's what one sees all the time with modern pipe bands. Very common for the waistcoats to be too short, and for the waistbelt to slip down in front. Obviously the belt has no support function, or it wouldn't slide down like that.



    Even current Highland Dress manufacturers and retailers will dress their models with the waistbelt showing under the waistcoat. (Maybe they're trying to sell more stuff?)



    I never wear a belt under my waistcoat, and rarely otherwise either.

    About the bottom button undone, a look through hundreds of vintage photos of men in Highland Dress shows that this was extremely rare. Either all the buttons are buttoned, or sometimes the top button or two might be undone, or perhaps a middle button or two. But the bottom one is almost always buttoned.
    Last edited by OC Richard; 21st June 15 at 05:31 AM.
    Proud Mountaineer from the Highlands of West Virginia; son of the Revolution and Civil War; first Europeans on the Guyandotte

  14. #10
    Join Date
    18th July 07
    Location
    North East Scotland
    Posts
    1,027
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Ashton View Post
    ...This apparently comes from King George VII who was a rotund man and could not get the bottom vest buttons done up so left the bottom of his vests gaping open and the rest of us followed along.....
    Just for the sake of accuracy, a potential George VII is less than 2 years old! Did you mean Edward VII?
    Alan

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0