X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: THE BLACK WATCH

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    1st March 04
    Location
    Stockton on Tees, UK
    Posts
    408
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    THE BLACK WATCH

    I was dismayed ( being polite about it) to see this afternoon that the UK Defence Secretary, Geoff Hoon, is to scarp the famous Black Watch Regiment in a major reform of the British armed forces.

    To remove such a glorious regiment, started in 1715 during the first Stewart rebellion, is just unbelievable.

    The Black Watch tartan is one which many of our members wear and is probably the most popular and famous tartan in the world.

    Perhaps some of our members may wish to express their support for a campaign to stop this monstrous act from happening.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    14th February 04
    Location
    Little Chute, Wisconsin
    Posts
    4,091
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I read that Blair and Hoon are meeting great resistance and Blair is backing away from the consolidation. They'll probably drop it for the sake of their political lives. There was a counterproposal that will possibly be accepted instead. Each Regiment would keep their individuality if enlistments permit, but would just be shifted to a common headquarters unit rather than individual HQs.

  3. #3
    macwilkin is offline
    Retired Forum Moderator
    Forum Historian

    Join Date
    22nd June 04
    Posts
    9,938
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Scottish Regiments...

    Besides the Black Watch, the Royal Scots Regiment, the oldest infantry regiment in the British Army -- raised in 1633 by Sir John Hepburn under royal warrant from King Charles I -- is being amalgamated with the King's Own Scottish Borderers, raised in 1689.

    Other units affected:

    The Royal Highland Fusiliers
    The Highlanders
    The Argyll & Sutherland Highlanders

    Plus a number of English & Welsh Regiments -- from my understanding, the Royal Welch Fusiliers and the Royal Regiment of Wales are to be merged.

    I think Bubba's assesment of the situation is correct.

    I am very sad this morning to read this news.

    Todd

  4. #4
    Join Date
    14th February 04
    Location
    Little Chute, Wisconsin
    Posts
    4,091
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As I understand it, Hoon and the General Staff are after more uniformity. They want to be easily able to transfer troops from any given unit to any other unit without complication. For most units that isn't a problem, but it won't work with assault units or the more elite. Even the US Army knows better than that. Units with real battle traditions and unit pride shouldn't be messed with. It only destroys morale and reduces the effectiveness of the units in question and combat effectiveness should never be sacrificed for command convenience if you want true military professionalism. I would consider the Highland regiments to be assault and elite units given their long battle histories and overall effectiveness in combat.

  5. #5
    macwilkin is offline
    Retired Forum Moderator
    Forum Historian

    Join Date
    22nd June 04
    Posts
    9,938
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    elite...

    I would consider the Highland regiments to be assault and elite units given their long battle histories and overall effectiveness in combat.
    The Officer Commanding of the 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit in Iraq praised the Black Watch as one of the most professional units he has ever worked with.

    T.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    23rd January 04
    Location
    from England now in Ontario Canada
    Posts
    1,162
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    well I spoze it kinda sux.
    but its a fact of life,cutbacks.
    my friend in the RAF says a lot of them have been offered a buyout, I think they have spent far too much over the past 10 or so years, with the gulf etc.
    same with big companys, cutbacks all over, it's no different in the forces, no room for romantic notions.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    23rd April 04
    Location
    Portland, Oregon USA
    Posts
    318
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That does suck Acaig. I read about it somewhere
    else the other day. By the way....I was peeking
    into your gallery and noticed you are also a
    Farquharson. Good shot of you at Invercauld House.
    I'm Farquharson on my fathers side (Finley) and
    an Elliott on mom's side (her maiden name).
    Yours aye,
    Muddy
    (Russ Finley)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    14th September 04
    Location
    London England
    Posts
    481
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Of course it is of regret to lose a famous named regiment: however that has always been the lot of the infantry, from names to numbers and then back to names.

    What is more important is the fact that the British infantry is already too small in numbers and instead of losing units, it should be being increased.

    My son had been going to follow me into my own regiment, but in view of how the army is being mistreated, underfunded and undermanned he will not now be so doing. I say my regiment, but it too changed it's name upon an earlier review.


    James

  9. #9
    macwilkin is offline
    Retired Forum Moderator
    Forum Historian

    Join Date
    22nd June 04
    Posts
    9,938
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    regiment...

    I say my regiment, but it too changed it's name upon an earlier review.
    James: which one, if I may be so bold to ask?

    Cheers,

    T.

  10. #10
    Doc Hudson's Avatar
    Doc Hudson is offline Membership Revoked for repeated rule violations.
    Join Date
    6th May 04
    Location
    Mississippi Delta
    Posts
    839
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by James
    Of course it is of regret to lose a famous named regiment: however that has always been the lot of the infantry, from names to numbers and then back to names.

    What is more important is the fact that the British infantry is already too small in numbers and instead of losing units, it should be being increased.

    My son had been going to follow me into my own regiment, but in view of how the army is being mistreated, underfunded and undermanned he will not now be so doing. I say my regiment, but it too changed it's name upon an earlier review.


    James
    Ain't it always that way James?

    It's bad enough that the soldier gets screwed on a daily basis, now they go and screw with tradition.

    If there was any doubt that the Empire has passed, the disbandment of the Black Watch is a certain proof.

    TOMMY

    I went into a public-'ouse to get a pint o' beer,
    The publican 'e up an' sez, "We serve no red-coats here."
    The girls be'ind the bar they laughed an' giggled fit to die,
    I outs into the street again an' to myself sez I:
    O it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Tommy, go away";
    But it's "Thank you, Mister Atkins", when the band begins to play,
    The band begins to play, my boys, the band begins to play,
    O it's "Thank you, Mister Atkins", when the band begins to play.

    I went into a theatre as sober as could be,
    They gave a drunk civilian room, but 'adn't none for me;
    They sent me to the gallery or round the music-'alls,
    But when it comes to fightin', Lord! they'll shove me in the stalls!
    For it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Tommy, wait outside";
    But it's "Special train for Atkins" when the trooper's on the tide,
    The troopship's on the tide, my boys, the troopship's on the tide,
    O it's "Special train for Atkins" when the trooper's on the tide.

    Yes, makin' mock o' uniforms that guard you while you sleep
    Is cheaper than them uniforms, an' they're starvation cheap;
    An' hustlin' drunken soldiers when they're goin' large a bit
    Is five times better business than paradin' in full kit.
    Then it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Tommy, 'ow's yer soul?"
    But it's "Thin red line of 'eroes" when the drums begin to roll,
    The drums begin to roll, my boys, the drums begin to roll,
    O it's "Thin red line of 'eroes" when the drums begin to roll.

    We aren't no thin red 'eroes, nor we aren't no blackguards too,
    But single men in barricks, most remarkable like you;
    An' if sometimes our conduck isn't all your fancy paints,
    Why, single men in barricks don't grow into plaster saints;
    While it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Tommy, fall be'ind",
    But it's "Please to walk in front, sir", when there's trouble in the wind,
    There's trouble in the wind, my boys, there's trouble in the wind,
    O it's "Please to walk in front, sir", when there's trouble in the wind.

    You talk o' better food for us, an' schools, an' fires, an' all:
    We'll wait for extry rations if you treat us rational.
    Don't mess about the cook-room slops, but prove it to our face
    The Widow's Uniform is not the soldier-man's disgrace.
    For it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Chuck him out, the brute!"
    But it's "Saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot;
    An' it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' anything you please;
    An' Tommy ain't a bloomin' fool -- you bet that Tommy sees!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0