-
17th July 10, 01:46 PM
#1
Are you man enough?
Typical fashion review
"...I was saying that two world wars and sexual revolution had to pass before woman could wear trousers on daily basis. I guess before a man would wear a skirt, we’ll see Apocalypse."
http://www.fashioner.com/2010/07/12/are-you-man-enough/
Steve
-
-
22nd July 10, 06:06 PM
#2
Another quote from the article:
Remember what Beirendonck said: a skirt has no gender, when the outfit is balanced.
Thanks for the link. It was an interesting read.
-
-
22nd July 10, 08:03 PM
#3
-
-
22nd July 10, 08:25 PM
#4
Rule #9
Was Rule #9 actually broken?
-
-
22nd July 10, 08:45 PM
#5
Originally Posted by Kilted-Knight
Was Rule #9 actually broken?
No, but some people sleep better at night when they can out-moderate the moderators.
The article in question talks about kilts (among other UBGs) and it still irks many people to have kilts classified as skirts.
-
-
22nd July 10, 10:01 PM
#6
Originally Posted by CDNSushi
... it still irks many people to have kilts classified as skirts.
I was being fitted for a production of Macbeth(spit,spin,knock) some years ago and the kilt they found which fit noone else but me was a nice DND BW, but it did come down past my knees. As I tried it on the director, a Clark, laughed and said I looked like I was wearing a skirt. I looked up at him quite matter of factly and opined, "It is a skirt".
It is still the most comfortable 'skirt' I have ever worn. Not that I've worn many you understand.
-
-
22nd July 10, 09:34 PM
#7
Men's Fashion Article
Originally Posted by MacMillan's son
Please see forum Rule #9
Please see the article.
-
-
22nd July 10, 10:37 PM
#8
Together with Gothic and cyberpunk elements they accomplish effect of postindustrial nomad, you know, a guy who tries to survive in post-atomic desolation; he's ripped off his clothes from a dead man, and eats radioactive honey and locusts.
Self-stylists and subcultures members uses dark, thick fabric, they wear layers (nomad omnia sua secum portat), they add fluorescent gadgets, a little bit of metal and an appropriate, often deconstructed t-shirt and viola - we look like a hybrid of John the Baptist and Mad Max.
Carobs or grasshoppers? Asks the long haired, misanthropic, Neo-Curmudgeonly hermit of the desert.
I tried to ask my inner curmudgeon before posting, but he sprayed me with the garden hose…
Yes, I have squirrels in my brain…
-
-
23rd July 10, 10:11 AM
#9
The longer I live in Asia, the more Western/Euro-centric articles like this seem to be. A man wears a skirt/kilt? BFD. Although I haven't worn a kilt in almost a year (the occasion hasn't arisen), I can count on one hand the times I have worn pants. Here in Nepal there are some 40+ ethnic groups and some say over 90 languages. Men wear lunghi and dhotis as do Indian (in fact many are Indians), Tibetan men wear chubas---floor length coats--- especially in the winter, Bhutanese wear a shorter, kilt-length version year-round, Buddhist monks wear robes that have a shang tab or ankle-length skirt, Hindu holy men wear several kinds of unbifurcated garments, etc. etc.
Conformity seems more rampant in the West in its own way, where some feel their masculinity so challenged when they step outside the norm by wearing a kilt or skirt that the colors and accessories must denote machismo, according to the article. But on the other hand clothes are more of a statement of one's individuality, rather than one's ethnicity, religion, caste, or other societal identifiers. I have come to appreciate Jock's approach to the kilt more and more. It, like much Nepali dress, is received wisdom, that shows where one comes from and where one fits into the culture, rather than carving out a statement about one's uniqueness.
Forgive my rambling. It's late here. And so to bed...
-
-
24th July 10, 01:01 AM
#10
Originally Posted by gilmore
The longer I live in Asia, the more Western/Euro-centric articles like this seem to be. A man wears a skirt/kilt? BFD. Although I haven't worn a kilt in almost a year (the occasion hasn't arisen), I can count on one hand the times I have worn pants. Here in Nepal there are some 40+ ethnic groups and some say over 90 languages. Men wear lunghi and dhotis as do Indian (in fact many are Indians), Tibetan men wear chubas---floor length coats--- especially in the winter, Bhutanese wear a shorter, kilt-length version year-round, Buddhist monks wear robes that have a shang tab or ankle-length skirt, Hindu holy men wear several kinds of unbifurcated garments, etc. etc.
Conformity seems more rampant in the West in its own way, where some feel their masculinity so challenged when they step outside the norm by wearing a kilt or skirt that the colors and accessories must denote machismo, according to the article. But on the other hand clothes are more of a statement of one's individuality, rather than one's ethnicity, religion, caste, or other societal identifiers. I have come to appreciate Jock's approach to the kilt more and more. It, like much Nepali dress, is received wisdom, that shows where one comes from and where one fits into the culture, rather than carving out a statement about one's uniqueness.
Forgive my rambling. It's late here. And so to bed...
This.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks