|
-
13th February 11, 12:44 AM
#1
Sunday Challenge
This is one of the pieces I 'discovered' this week.
A little Sunday challenge. What do you see? Answers later today.
-
-
13th February 11, 05:40 AM
#2
Looks like either Handkerchiefs or Baby receiving blankets.
-
-
13th February 11, 06:39 AM
#3
 Originally Posted by Poohspot18
Looks like either Handkerchiefs or Baby receiving blankets.
Perhaps I should have added that it's 52' x about 12' long. Some handkerchief
-
-
13th February 11, 09:00 AM
#4
The size and white background suggest an arisaid. Happy, as ever, to be wrong!
It's coming yet for a' that,
That Man to Man, the world o'er,
Shall brothers be for a' that. - RB
-
-
13th February 11, 09:54 AM
#5
 Originally Posted by figheadair
Perhaps I should have added that it's 52' x about 12' long. Some handkerchief 
Peter I hope you meant 52 INCHES x about 12 FEET and your 52'x 12' has a slight typo in it, other wise it goes from a tablecloth to car cover for an 18 wheeler.
I note one of the ringes is purled, another diamond cut like a pair of common garment scissors might leave, something that I believe is a relatively new (20th century) invention. Also looks more like cotton than wool but of that I cannot be sure. Also not sure what the written tag on the far left says as I cannot mag it up enough to clearly read it, but thinki there might be the word "sale" typed there.
Maybe more ideas later.
-
-
13th February 11, 10:18 AM
#6
Typo indeed 52" it is - in total (clue). Delfinitely wool
 Originally Posted by ForresterModern
I note one of the ringes is purled, another diamond cut like a pair of common garment scissors might leave, something that I believe is a relatively new (20th century) invention.
I don't understand what you mean. Are you referring to the knotted tassels on the upper right section?
Also not sure what the written tag on the far left says as I cannot mag it up enough to clearly read it, but thinki there might be the word "sale" typed there.
It says 'Said to have been worn by a woman hunting the battlefield of Culloden for wounded'.
If that's not a clue I don't know what is!
Last edited by figheadair; 13th February 11 at 10:30 AM.
-
-
13th February 11, 01:58 PM
#7
 Originally Posted by figheadair
Typo indeed  52" it is - in total (clue). Delfinitely wool
I don't understand what you mean. Are you referring to the knotted tassels on the upper right section?
It says 'Said to have been worn by a woman hunting the battlefield of Culloden for wounded'.
If that's not a clue I don't know what is!
Forrester means, the fringe ( sometimes called purling)
and has miss identified the joining/hemming by red crossed stitches , as cut by pinking shears....
-
-
13th February 11, 01:23 PM
#8
 Originally Posted by ForresterModern
Peter I hope you meant 52 INCHES x about 12 FEET and your 52'x 12' has a slight typo in it, other wise it goes from a tablecloth to car cover for an 18 wheeler.
-
-
13th February 11, 07:00 PM
#9
She's pretty confident to wear white out to hunt bodies.
-
-
13th February 11, 11:48 PM
#10
So, look and you will see, and yes it does help to have a bigger screen 
Given the (correct) size clue and Culloden reference here's what can be deduced from the picture:
- This is a white based blanket pattern of the type often called an arisaid tartan.
- There are three sections; top and bottom which overlay the central section. Conclusion - in/for the photo the ends have been overlaid towards the centre.
- There is a join in the centre of the piece. It's clearly visible in the top and bottom section. It the lower portion it can be seen in the left most full white square meaning that the ends have not been folded over in line. Conclusion - this is a joined plaid cut form a single length.
- The two joined pieces result in four ends that are finished in three different ways; knotted (purled), bound with red thread, left raw. Conclusion the original plaid have been damaged/cut at a later date and the original finishing is not immediately apparent.
- The two ends of the joined piece do not balance i.e. they finish at a different point. The two pieces of the lower end match whereas those on the upper piece don't. Conclusion - the match bottom end is probably original, the upper end is not the original.
- The upper left piece shows the beginning of the coloured band that can be seen towards the end of the bottom end. Conclusion - the upper joined end probably matched the lower one.
Here's an overview of one side of the piece sowing the join and the barred selvedge (herringboned).

I don't put any credence in the Culloden claim which is just a typical romantic story attached to any old piece of tartan. Personally I don't believe that these white based setts were used for clothing - far too impractical, and that these setts were used on domestic plaids. Given the (surviving) size of this piece I doubt it was practical for wearing.
The red wool thread that binds the lower right, and onto the lower left, end looks to be original and is possibly how both ends were finished. This is unusual and the only example I've ever seen of a plaid not having turned and sewn ends. For whatever reason the upper end was not finished (unlikely) or was damaged and someone has attempted to finish one piece at a later date.
-
Similar Threads
-
By Cynthia in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 23
Last Post: 17th February 09, 08:45 PM
-
By Clockwork John in forum General Celtic Music Talk
Replies: 0
Last Post: 8th October 08, 04:01 PM
-
By Riverkilt in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 10
Last Post: 1st October 07, 04:32 AM
-
By Arlen in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 16
Last Post: 15th June 07, 08:41 AM
-
By Bernie in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 7
Last Post: 6th September 05, 08:03 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks