The Duke of Windsor's Waistline

[xman]

Inspired by the kilts in this picture of the Duke of Windsor's kilt closet ...



I sewed my new dragon boat paddling kilt, a 5 yard Clan Donald Modern (I shrunk out of my former ), with a similar waistline. I think it came out pretty well. Today was its maiden voyage. If more photos show up on the net I'll link them here. Here's a closer look at the waist too.



What do you think?

X

[Ryan Ross]

Man...That's FANCY!

Brilliant job done, for sure!

Don't think it'd be what I would choose for myself, but I'll be very interested to hear how you like it.

[Jock Scot]

Pssst, can I give you a quiet word of advice, whilst no one is about?

Your hose tops could look a lot more in proportion and the flashes would then be higher up, where they normally live.

The easy way is fold the bottom edge of you hose tops back to the top(thus halving the turnover), that may not be possible as the now inside of the hose top will now be on the outside and might look all wrong.

The slightly more complicated (to explain!) is fold the bottom two thirds of the hose top back up to the top so that one third is actually near the knee and then fold the top third back over the rest so that the outside pattern is showing. Looks a tad chunky, but more in proportion.

Hope you don't mind, me saying? Ignore me if you wish!

[MacMillans son]

Sorry X, I didn't catch the original thread on your first kilt. For those of us not quite savvy on kilt construction, what makes this waist different than other kilts ? It appears to be cut higher in the back than in the front, but we see plenty of kilts here that are just worn that way (especially by our...errr....more round middled members). Can you clarify for us, perhaps with the difference in construction techniques or challenges?

[xman]

Sorry X, I didn't catch the original thread on your first kilt. For those of us not quite savvy on kilt construction, what makes this waist different than other kilts ? It appears to be cut higher in the back than in the front, but we see plenty of kilts here that are just worn that way (especially by our...errr....more round middled members). Can you clarify for us, perhaps with the difference in construction techniques or challenges?

This is the original thread. You're right, Terry. The waist is higher in the back than in the front. This should be of a benefit more or less to anyone who wears their kilt lower in the front because it'll keep the hem line even front to back as Steve explains in his measurements guide video. It is also a bit of a trainer for the mini kilt I am starting now. Since I will be wearing this kilt in a seated position very often, I wanted to get the bulk of fabric from the traditional waistline out of my way. My first impression is that it has worked, but I'll have to wait for a while to get better acquainted with the new style. My other first impression is that I could have made the kilt sit a little lower just above my hip bones and the angle would be of more benefit still. Also, for someone as small as I am I think the angle is a bit steep. It's not at all uncomfortable, but aesthetically it's slightly stark

No waistband.

Actually there is a medium/heavyweight black cotton waistband above the pleats. For the rest I just pulled the fabric over to create the top. The only other real difference in construction is that the canvass in the front needed to be shaped to accommodate the angle, a little more so on the under apron that the over.

Your hose tops could look a lot more in proportion and the flashes would then be higher up, where they normally live.

I shall take it under advisement.

[creagdhubh]

Well done mate!

I have seen various photos of the late Duke of Windsor's (highly organised, in which I love) closet before, very interesting to observe indeed - notice the 'blanket/day' plaid in the restricted Balmoral tartan hanging directly behind the matching kilt (see photo and video link below of both of these garments in action), you can also see the same check jacket and waistcoat HRH is wearing in the visual examples below, hanging behind the plaid. It is said that HRH maintained the same waistline all of his life and judging by the many photos and videos I have seen of The Duke of Windsor through the years, I would have to agree. Should we all be so lucky.

Perfect examples of how to traditionally wear a 'blanket/day' plaid whilst kilted:



http://www.britishpathe.com/video/th...query/Balmoral

Cheers,

P.S. - I own the same style and colour of hose you are wearing in your series of photos, as well as many other colours of this particular style made by House of Cheviot. I have always bought size small, even though technically I should wear a size large due to my foot size and height, however, I find that size small hose in this style (and that goes for country socks as well), with the rather lengthy turnover, is far better suited on my legs than a larger size. The larger size go too far up my legs and practically 'swallow up' my knee-cap - not so good - whereas with the size small, the top of the turnover reaches about a 2-3 finger breadth beneath my knee-cap, thus wearing the kilt hose at their appropriate height and I do not have to worry about 'doubling over' the tops inadvertently creating a pair of 'giant,' unsightly cuffs! Just something to think about.

[JSFMACLJR]

Well done mate!

I have seen various photos of the late Duke of Windsor's (highly organised, in which I love) closet before, very interesting to observe indeed - notice the 'blanket/day' plaid in the restricted Balmoral tartan hanging directly behind the matching kilt (see photo and video link below of both of these garments in action), you can also see the same check jacket and waistcoat His Grace is wearing in the visual examples below, hanging behind the plaid. It is said that His Grace maintained the same waistline all of his life and judging by the many photos and videos I have seen of the Duke through the years, I would have to agree. Should we all be so lucky.

Perfect examples of how to traditionally wear a 'blanket/day' plaid whilst kilted:



http://www.britishpathe.com/video/th...query/Balmoral

Cheers,

P.S. - I own the same style and colour of hose you are wearing in your series of photos, as well as many other colours of this particular style made by House of Cheviot. I have always bought size small, even though technically I should wear a size large due to my foot size and height, however, I find that size small hose in this style (and that goes for country socks as well), with the rather lengthy turnover, is far better suited on my legs than a larger size. The larger size go too far up my legs and practically 'swallow up' my knee-cap - not so good - whereas with the size small, the top of the turnover reaches about a 2-3 finger breadth beneath my knee-cap, thus wearing the kilt hose at their appropriate height and I do not have to worry about 'doubling over' the tops inadvertently creating a pair of 'giant,' unsightly cuffs! Just something to think about.

PS to Kyle ( creagdhubh ) : HRH The Duke of Windsor would have been called "His Royal Highness" rather than "His Grace", as he was a royal duke.

[MacGumerait]

PS to Kyle ( creagdhubh ) : HRH The Duke of Windsor would have been called "His Royal Highness" rather than "His Grace", as he was a royal duke.

You are correct he was an HRH , the title Duke of Windsor was given to him after he abdicated the throne .

Anyhow , back on subject . Love the kilt "xmarks " ! I notice you are wearing leather sporran straps . I have seen many opinions about leather versus chain . I have both , what's your take ? Just curious .

[creagdhubh]

PS to Kyle ( creagdhubh ) : HRH The Duke of Windsor would have been called "His Royal Highness" rather than "His Grace", as he was a royal duke.

Thanks Sandy! I couldn't remember precisely, as I posted the response rather quickly and didn't bother to look it up online - I should have done so, apologies! I'll make the correction immediately.

Cheers,

[knotty]

The slightly more complicated (to explain!) is fold the bottom two thirds of the hose top back up to the top so that one third is actually near the knee and then fold the top third back over the rest so that the outside pattern is showing. Looks a tad chunky, but more in proportion.

I have 1 set of hose that I have to fold the tops down then halve the tops up. Makes for 3 layers on the top & somewhat chunky, but the look isnt bad. Intererstingly theyre the same color as yours.