-
1st March 13, 05:17 AM
#1
Wonderful images of kilts in a 1928 film
thought this was a lot of fun, but don't take it too seriously...
-
-
1st March 13, 06:06 AM
#2
That was wonderful. I am really glad I had the time to watch that. Made my day.
-
-
1st March 13, 06:50 AM
#3
Thanks for posting that! It's amazing, how clear the film is, how great the special effects are, how inventive and funny the whole thing is.
Interesting that in 1928 the end of The Civil War was only 53 years in the past, as far in the past as The Vietnam War is today, and that nearly all the older men in the US would have been Civil War veterans.
Proud Mountaineer from the Highlands of West Virginia; son of the Revolution and Civil War; first Europeans on the Guyandotte
-
-
1st March 13, 06:51 AM
#4
Originally Posted by OC Richard
Thanks for posting that! It's amazing, how clear the film is, how great the special effects are, how inventive and funny the whole thing is.
Interesting that in 1928 the end of The Civil War was only 53 years in the past, as far in the past as The Vietnam War is today, and that nearly all the older men in the US would have been Civil War veterans.
***
Crazy to think about, Richard. Thanks for posting, Paul!
-
-
1st March 13, 07:19 AM
#5
slàinte mhath, Chuck
Originally Posted by MeghanWalker,In answer to Goodgirlgoneplaids challenge:
"My sporran is bigger and hairier than your sporran"
Pants is only a present tense verb here. I once panted, but it's all cool now.
-
-
1st March 13, 07:35 AM
#6
Very fun stuff (although I'm not sure about Richard's math. . .)
Proudly Duncan [maternal], MacDonald and MacDaniel [paternal].
-
-
1st March 13, 07:38 AM
#7
What wonderful nonsense! Loved every second.
Thanks Paul.
Regards
Chas
-
-
1st March 13, 11:28 AM
#8
Originally Posted by OC Richard
Thanks for posting that! It's amazing, how clear the film is, how great the special effects are, how inventive and funny the whole thing is.
Interesting that in 1928 the end of The Civil War was only 53 years in the past, as far in the past as The Vietnam War is today, and that nearly all the older men in the US would have been Civil War veterans.
1928 was 63 years after the end of the Civil War in 1865, and 2013 is 38 years after the Fall of Saigon in 1975, so your math is off on both counts, I'm afraid. I doubt there were many Civil War veterans surviving in 1928.
-
-
1st March 13, 12:20 PM
#9
In 1930, the population of the US was 122 million. If 12% of the Civil War veterans survived to 80 years old, there would have been approx. 267,000 who reached that age. If every single one of them were alive in 1928, which is extremely doubtful (a 20 yr old in 1865 surviving until1928 would have been 83), they would have made up approx. 2% of the population. I don't know what your definition of "nearly all the older men in the US" is, but it certainly could not have been true in 1928 that even a majority were Civil War veterans.
-
-
1st March 13, 10:19 PM
#10
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks