X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 15

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    12th March 15
    Location
    Thornton, Colorado
    Posts
    395
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    A question about Hamilton tartan

    I do know I have many Hamilton ancestors of Grange, Scotland before they migrated to Charles Co, Maryland a long time ago. They were part of the House of Hamilton, a Lowland clan.

    I've searched for the Hamilton tartan, and learned that it was designed to honor Alexander Hamilton, a founding father of the United States Coastal Guard which the Hamilton tartan was also to be known as the USCG tartan. It was registered in 1842. There was no evidence of any Hamilton to wear any tartan before 1842.

    My question is.. Since I'm not related to Alexander despite sharing the same surname. So, I shouldn't adopt or at least accept the current Hamilton tartan as part of my family's tartans, right? Yet, on the site for the Hamilton clans. They adopted that USCG tartan while acknowledging our ancestors didn't have a tartan of their owns. I want to be educated on this unique situation.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    22nd January 07
    Location
    Morganton, North Carolina
    Posts
    2,173
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think you're confused. The Hamilton tartan is one of the Lowland tartans featured in the Vestiarium Scoticum, published in 1842. Most clan tartans are not that old.

    The US Coast Guard tartan was designed with the Hamilton tartan in mind, because of the connection to Alexander Hamilton.

    If your surname is Hamilton, wear the Hamilton tartan.

  3. The Following User Says 'Aye' to davidlpope For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    Join Date
    12th March 15
    Location
    Thornton, Colorado
    Posts
    395
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ah, that makes sense now after re-read the Hamilton tartan description.

    Thank you!

  5. #4
    Join Date
    18th October 09
    Location
    Orange County California
    Posts
    11,020
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    By all means wear the Hamilton tartan, but be aware that it was designed by two English brothers as part of an elaborate hoax. It is not ancient or authentic or Highland or even Scottish (its only connexion to Scotland is that the Englishmen happened to be living in Scotland when they invented it).
    Proud Mountaineer from the Highlands of West Virginia; son of the Revolution and Civil War; first Europeans on the Guyandotte

  6. The Following 3 Users say 'Aye' to OC Richard For This Useful Post:


  7. #5
    Join Date
    12th March 15
    Location
    Thornton, Colorado
    Posts
    395
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That's what I suspect after all there was no evidence of my Hamilton ancestors designed, or at least wore them.

  8. #6
    Join Date
    17th June 15
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    713
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by OC Richard View Post
    By all means wear the Hamilton tartan, but be aware that it was designed by two English brothers as part of an elaborate hoax. It is not ancient or authentic or Highland or even Scottish (its only connexion to Scotland is that the Englishmen happened to be living in Scotland when they invented it).
    Aye, things may have started as a hoax, but many a clan chief has accepted a tartan from the brothers Allan, so who are we to judge? As a proud member of clan Buchanan, there is no evidence of our tartan before 1850, several years after the Sobieskies "manuscript'. Then again, most modern tartans are from the 19th century at the earliest, so I say wear your centuries old family tartan with pride.

  9. The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to Wareyin For This Useful Post:


  10. #7
    Join Date
    12th March 15
    Location
    Thornton, Colorado
    Posts
    395
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Now that's something to ponder about.. How many tartans exist before 1842, created/designed by their clan ancestors, and no aid needed from any Englishman?

  11. #8
    Join Date
    2nd January 10
    Location
    Lethendy, Perthshire
    Posts
    4,683
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Wareyin View Post
    Aye, things may have started as a hoax, but many a clan chief has accepted a tartan from the brothers Allan, so who are we to judge? As a proud member of clan Buchanan, there is no evidence of our tartan before 1850, several years after the Sobieskies "manuscript'. Then again, most modern tartans are from the 19th century at the earliest, so I say wear your centuries old family tartan with pride.
    There is ample evidence for the existence of the Buchanan tartan pre-1850.; have a read of this.

  12. #9
    Join Date
    22nd January 07
    Location
    Morganton, North Carolina
    Posts
    2,173
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    OR Richard tends to be a bit tough on the Sobieskis. Regardless of the spurious origins of the VS, the tartans it contained, for the most part, have been accepted as the tartans of their respective clans. While there are some clan tartans that date to before 1842, that's pretty old.

    The accepted convention is to wear the tartan associated with your surname.

  13. The Following 5 Users say 'Aye' to davidlpope For This Useful Post:


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0