Realignment 2

[highlandtide]

Ok guys. I know that we had seperate forums for some of the new kiltmakers. We have so many kiltmakers on the forum now it just really isnt feesable or fair to give some kiltmakers their own forum and some dont get them.

I really hope that you understand. Thanks.

[bubba]

How about sections for traditional, casual and contemporary.

[Rob Wright]

I second Bubba's suggestion.

Rob Wright

[Jimmy Carbomb]

THIS IS OUTSTANDING!

This has become a kilt forum instead of a FREE ADVERTISEMENT for kilt companies! OUTSTANDING!!

I would imagine that this will foster some better conversation about kilts in general, and garner some better comparisons between the products.

NICELY DONE HANK!!!

Two thumbs up!!

[zeytoun]

Looks good to me. Some of the previous sections were bustling, and some were dead. Getting rid of just the dead ones would seem unfair, keeping them all is just impractical. I think a page of links to kiltmakers with brief discriptions is all that's needed.

[GMan]

Nice, precise, and without a doubt a very clean improvement

To you Hank

[highlandtide]

I hope the kiltmakers understand. It was the only fair thing to do wth so many on the forum now.

[elijah]

I completely understand. King Kilts will glady sacrifice it's forum for the good of the community, but wait you may say, "King Kilts didn't have a forum." Oh.

[Graham]

Ah now I'm working out where everything has gone.!

The USAK forum (for example) posts are now under "Contemporary & Non-Traditional Kilts", is that how USA kilts are regarded? I've always thought of them as more traditional, just a small point.

[Freelander Sporrano]

Me too!!