Post Your Granted, Assumed or Desired Arms

[Harold Cannon]

MOR Thanks a whole bunch but I have some questions.

As for a blazon, based on what is seen, I think I'd consider:

ARMS: Or within a bordure gules a lion rampant defamed* sable brandishing with its dexter paw a broadsword proper overall on a chief gules within a demi-bordure or three Maltese crosses argent.

(*It may be that you have intended this charge to be a bear rampant, but from the way it is drawn it can only be interpreted as a tail-less lion. If it is your intent to display a lion, then it would benefit from the addition of a tail; if it is a bear, then it needs to be drawn as such, ie: muzzled.)

CREST: (on a wreath of the colours or and gules) upon a grassy mound a bear* statant erect supporting a lochaber axe with his forepaws his dexter hind foot resting upon a rock all proper.

(*Bears, to distinguish them from other animals, are properly depicted as muzzled unless blazoned to the contrary.)

You will note that Joe and I have taken a different approach to the blazon of the bordure. I have chosen to treat both bordures as ordinaries (one red, the other gold) to avoid the possibility of confusing Harold's livery colours with those of the chief of his clan. Were no such confusion to arise, then I would follow Joe's blazon, but would be specific as to the counter-change:

all within a bordure counter-changed in chief

to avoid giving the impression that the bordure was being used as a mark of cadency.

(IS THERE A WAY TO NOT HAVE TO MUZZLE THE BEAR AND WHAT DO YOU VIEW AS MY LIVERY COLORS? I THOUGHT THEY WOULD BE GOLD AND BLACK AND I DONT MIND THAT BECAUSE I WAS GOING TO CHANGE MY COCKADES TO LIVERY COLORS AND THAT WOULD KILL TWO BIRDS WITH ONE STONE IN A WAY. ALSO THE BORDURE IS NOT A CADENCY MARK.)