Full mask sporrans revisited...

[Nathan]

I've been enjoying this book, Kinloch Anderson - A Scottish Tradition by Deirdre Kinloch Anderson. It truly is a great book for fans of Highland attire. It has photos, catalogue excerpts, artifacts and is well written. Many of the images and topics covered in the book are xmarks favourites. The book even identifies the tartans of the Royal family and why they choose them.

IMG_20140528_173342.jpg

But that's just background. The one part of this marvelous book that surprised me was this little gem on the corner of a page about sporrans.

IMG_20140528_173622.jpg

It comes right out and says "This is no longer acceptable as Highland Dress accessory".

As you may know, I have a full mask sporran and wear it.

IMG_20140524_103634.jpg

The full mask sporran is viewed as a traditional and versatile accessory by some on this forum. The Kinloch Anderson note has given me pause to reflect on when a tradition should be put to rest. Is this one of those times? What do YOU think? Is it a classic traditional item of Highland dress that is as handsome today as ever it was or is it a gory symbol of a bygone era that is not in keeping with modern mores and sensitivities?

I know it has been discussed, but given that a respected Highland outfitter has declared it passé, I think the topic warrants revisiting. Your thoughts?