X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 12

Threaded View

  1. #7
    Join Date
    15th October 18
    Location
    Scottish Borders
    Posts
    70
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Just a guess

    Quote Originally Posted by figheadair View Post
    I've yet to find when and where this tradition arose.
    The chances are that there may be no documentary evidence of how the tradition arose, but it's possible to make an educated guess. My guess would be that trews with no outer seem simply became the fashion for Army Officers.

    The history of the introduction of tartan trousers, renamed as 'trews,' for the Scottish Lowland Regiments following the Cardwell reforms of 1881 is well documented and needs no rehearsal here. It is also well known that many Highland Battalions had worn tartan trousers as undress uniform for specific duties for decades prior to this. However, the enshrinement of tartan trews in the vestiarium of dress uniforms from 1881 probably led those who could afford it - officers - to purchase the best that could be had, perhaps initially for Mess Dress and also possibly for their Dress Uniforms. Seemless trews with the cavalry cut do look better and are certainly more expensive - they have the air of 'Officer' written all over them and they probably were made by the best tailors for officers who were required to purchase their own uniforms - a situation which persists to some degree to this day. Once such trews became accepted and approved of, they would come to be considered traditional for officers to wear, then essential and eventually mandatory.

    My own experience as a Naval Officer has allowed me to glimpse one or two traditions in the wearing of uniform which will forever remain undocumented, e.g., the distinctive (to those who know) Gieves cap and badge was ordered to be worn for certain duties with the implication that failure to comply would earn eternal disgrace, ridicule or perhaps worse - but there were no written regulations to back up up such orders - it was simply a tradition - it had become 'the done thing.' Besides, who was going to argue against wearing the most comfortable officer's cap money could buy when the alternative was to wear the crown of thorns issued by Pusser. I know this is not an exact parallel, but I think it begins to illustrate how some uniform traditions which begin with officers buying the best they can get eventually become the accepted norm.
    Last edited by Dr Bee; 24th November 19 at 08:52 AM.

  2. The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to Dr Bee For This Useful Post:


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0