Quote Originally Posted by Jock Scot View Post
The mistake that you are making OCR, is that you are trying to be far too precise with MOD colours. It just didn't happen that way.Its not really surprising when millions of men and women from all over the Empire and elsewhere were involved. Often sourcing their uniform cloth from more local manufacturers. So there was never any likelihood of colour uniformity. A Sergeant Major's night mare for sure, but it was inevitable when the numbers of men and women and the thousands of miles between suppliers were considered.
Right, and I specifically mention that both in the USA and Britain the shade varied from contractor to contractor.

It's well known, for example, that Canadian Battle Dress tended to be a greener shade than British.

Just within the British army in WWII

Although covered by specification, the cloth used for British army battle dress varied considerably both in weight and colour, depending on batch from mill production. A rank of soldiers on parade was rarely completely uniform, and the variations extended to a single squaddie's blouse and trousers.

Yet, if you see a group of WWI British officers their tunics, though no two will be identical, will be within a certain range of "khaki" and their shirts, though no two will be identical, will be within a certain second range of "khaki".

In other words, as I had mentioned, colours exist in a continuum and each country, language, dialect, or in this case military fashion, draws the lines (arbitrary though they may be) at different places.

So you wouldn't see an officer's tunic in shirt khaki and shirt in tunic khaki- there was agreement that the shirt should be a lighter shade than the tunic. With the neckies, they seemed to often be a distinct third shade of khaki.