X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
-
1st April 07, 12:36 AM
#1
Two kilts compared:
A Neokilt and a Sportkilt.
I'm beginning to understand a few things about garments that I hadn't previously been aware of. It's the sort of knowledge that explains why there are so many different ways to make an unbifurcated garment compared to a bifurcated one.
Both of my kilts are lovely, but they are quite different. Putting the Sportkilt on and I can immediately see the difference in their cut. The way the top apron folds is quite different, just for one example. I should mention that the Sportkilt is poly/cotton and the Neokilt is poly-viscose. The difference in the fabric is quite apparant and I can now understand why wool is usually chosen for a kilt; the Sportkilt is actually very light and the Neokilt is a little stiff.
Actually, I found myself almost wishing for a combination of features, such as the elastic and the slightly lower wasitline of the Sportkilt on the Neokilt. And pockets! Neokilt has two little pockets that are not of a great use, and the Sportkilt has one in the middle that is unfortunately almost impossible to use. A friend commented about the Neokilt also commented favourably about the pockets (adding how hard it was to find skirts with good pockets). I know Utilikilt do pockets; surely they are not so hard to put into a more traditional design? Admittedly, what Neokilt did is quite clever, hidden in the depths of the pleats, but they need to be higher and deeper.
So I now have an appreciation of kiltmaker preferences!
Wade.
* Yes, I can probably find someone who does that.
-
Similar Threads
-
By Beery in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 17
Last Post: 7th September 08, 12:40 PM
-
By yoippari in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 26
Last Post: 1st June 07, 01:51 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks