data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01fa0/01fa01748f66dbe7e358dcbfdd626e558c8dec22" alt="Quote"
Originally Posted by
pdcorlis
Guidelines rather than rules I suspect comes closer to the truth of it for us non-military types. As an artist, I suspect these evolved guidelines boil down to a matter of proportion. Why a wide belt and not a skinny one? Why a hand width gap between the bottom of the belt and the top of the sporran? Why a short waisted jacket and not a longer one? Why hose at four fingers below the knee and a kilt at the top of the knee? I suspect that much like the golden rectangle, these proportions have been judged more visually pleasing than all the attempted alternatives.
Bend the "rules" break the "rules" if you'd like I suppose. Why not - after all that's what fashion is all about.
Now for the matter of rubber chicken sporrans? I believe they are Dadaism pure and simple.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/157aa/157aa8228eaa5818918c242edfc1d46deba521e6" alt="Wink"
I agree with Phil. I'm also delighted that we have Matt and his cool reasoned analysis of XMTs folk.
I am retired military and understand the importance of wearing the uniform properly; but I seldom do that now except when it's Burns' Night or I'm in a SCD show.
Reason should always win out. Well, I'm a philosopher so I should think that.
Past President, St. Andrew's Society of the Inland Northwest
Member, Royal Scottish Country Dance Society
Founding Member, Celtic Music Spokane
Member, Royal Photographic Society
Bookmarks