X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
-
Originally Posted by MacMillan of Rathdown
Along the same lines of questioning-- I vaguely recall something about the size of the sett being different for chiefs... another raisin in the Victorian pudding, or is there some latent truth to this?
Like you I think I recall something about this ,but I can't say I have ever seen it ,or, perhaps I have never taken any notice.
There was also a vague suggestion that Clan Chiefs could have their own tartan.Why not? All it takes is a large dose of ego and money! Some one reminded me of this here,a wee while ago, somewhere, where I think it was a Campbell Chief had an extra stripe put into his tartan. I don't think it is in use today. I cannot think of any other Chiefly tartan, although there may be, I suppose.
In both of the above cases, I think they were mainly one of those pretentious figments of the Victorian imagination. Am I wrong?
-
Similar Threads
-
By Kilted Christian in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 12
Last Post: 3rd May 07, 11:35 AM
-
By caig in forum The Clans
Replies: 8
Last Post: 11th October 06, 02:05 PM
-
By Eric T in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 16
Last Post: 26th May 06, 04:30 PM
-
By Casey in forum Traditional Kilt Wear
Replies: 9
Last Post: 30th August 04, 12:33 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks