X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
-
22nd July 10, 09:29 AM
#31
Originally Posted by Hothir Ethelnor
I guess I meant the fighting unit without considering bands or other nonstandard groups within a military unit.
There is also at least one militia unit which wore the kilt in California.
Well...historians are still debating how much the kilt was worn by the 79th. We do know that it was worn when the 79th was a pre and post-Civil War militia/"chum & chowder" unit, but the 79th wearing the kilt in combat is another story.
And yes, I am familiar with the Wallace Guard...I'm the one who posted the thread about it.
One more comment about bands being a "nonstandard" group...I'm not sure I follow your use of that word. Remember than bandsmen have traditionally filled the role of stretcher-bearers/corpsmen/etc. in military history. Even today in the British Army, members of the Royal Regiment of Scotland are soldiers first and bandsmen second. Pipers and bandsmen alike frequently saw combat.
The aforementioned units of the US Armed Forces, regulars, reserves and National Guard, are still military personnel and therefore, entitled to be mentioned along with the 79th.
T.
Last edited by macwilkin; 22nd July 10 at 09:39 AM.
-
Similar Threads
-
By Donnie in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 30
Last Post: 2nd February 09, 07:13 AM
-
By Riverkilt in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 20
Last Post: 17th July 08, 03:26 PM
-
By Jerry in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 24
Last Post: 22nd June 06, 08:39 AM
-
By Donnie in forum Professional Kiltmakers Hints and Tips
Replies: 2
Last Post: 2nd April 05, 08:03 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks