|
-
23rd July 11, 08:42 AM
#1
 Originally Posted by M. A. C. Newsome
As to the waistband, the original in this kilt would have been green, as in this photo:
I suspect that it got worn out at some point and whomever owned the kilt either replaced it or covered it over with the white cloth. I would have chosen a darker color certainly.
I've got a different theory, given the normal high rise of regimental kilts and the relative short length of this kilt, plus the fact that it is sized for someone 5'11"-6'. I'd bet a bottle of whisky that the kilt was cut down, from the top, for a shorter man and the white waistband was added at that time.
Either way, very nice find and it fits you very well. I would suggest rethinking the regimental badge on the sporran, though. I know they're readily available, but (in my mind at least) there is an inherent, implied claim that you served in the regiment by wearing the regiment's badge.
I do like the sporran, itself, though. Very Nice!
-
-
23rd July 11, 09:56 AM
#2
You got a helluva deal! Congrats!!
 Originally Posted by davidlpope
I've got a different theory, given the normal high rise of regimental kilts and the relative short length of this kilt, plus the fact that it is sized for someone 5'11"-6'. I'd bet a bottle of whisky that the kilt was cut down, from the top, for a shorter man and the white waistband was added at that time. 
I'm in absolute agreement David!! Given the "shortness" of the kilt itself based on the new owner's description and the shortness of the inside lining (typical apron/inner apron linings should be 6-8" down from the top...this appears to be about 3"), I would wager a bunch of money that this kilt has been cut shorter from the top...which then explains why it has the awful white waistband vs. the original green one. I'd actually love to get my hands on this kilt and do some trim work on it to "improve" it...but given my extremely busy schedule, I will refrain from offering.
"If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace." -- Thomas Paine
Scottish-American Military Society Post 1921
-
-
23rd July 11, 04:22 PM
#3
 Originally Posted by davidlpope
I've got a different theory, given the normal high rise of regimental kilts and the relative short length of this kilt, plus the fact that it is sized for someone 5'11"-6'. I'd bet a bottle of whisky that the kilt was cut down, from the top, for a shorter man and the white waistband was added at that time.
Either way, very nice find and it fits you very well. I would suggest rethinking the regimental badge on the sporran, though. I know they're readily available, but (in my mind at least) there is an inherent, implied claim that you served in the regiment by wearing the regiment's badge.
I do like the sporran, itself, though. Very Nice!
Makes sense. I never thought to do a side by side comparison of this kilt with my others. I just thought I got lucky on the length, since every standard length kilt is too long for me.
I like the sporran too, I just wasn't certain if the badge on the front of it was military in nature. Now that I know that it is, would I be better off keeping it original and selling it, trying to recoup the cost of future kilt alterations and avoiding looking like a poser, or should I keep it and replace the badge with something fire department related?
Fir Na Tine
Braithre Thar Gach Ni
Crisis does not Create Character, it Merely Reveals it.
-
-
23rd July 11, 07:30 PM
#4
I'd keep the sporran and replace the badge.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks