Quote Originally Posted by seanachie View Post
I'm am not trying to debate this, but I have seen several comments that UKs have slipped as far as quality in recent times. I had a UK and my reason for getting rid of it was that the apron was too narrow for my taste. That said the original was a very thin, very light weight kilt and while there weren't any patent defects I would not marvel over it. Given some of the kiltmakers mentioned here I would be hardpressed to recommend a UK over some of them. So there in a congenial and friendly way is my 2 cents.
My post was purely from my personal experience. If there's been issues with the UK products, I wasn't aware of them. I've been to the UK store in Seattle a number of times and had nothing but good experiences. I know they're pretty tight when it comes quality control; I got my last mocker at half price because the pockets were 1/2" too wide. (?)

UK's aren't made like traditional kilts. The apron is quite narrow compared to a traditional kilt; it is worn differently of course. The weight of the fabric depends entirely on what version purchased. I've never owned an original model, so I can't speak to it's quality. As I mentioned above, I own a number of UKs and traditional kilts, and they both have their place. I like my UKs nearly as much as my wool kilts. I bear no ill will towards anyone who isn't a fan of them; variety is the spice of life, yes? However, based on the OP's question, I respectfully stand by my recommendations.

Regardless, I look forward to seeing which way you go, hkjrb623. Best of luck!