-
18th February 12, 05:39 PM
#11
Re: 120 seconds?
Steve, I think it was a shorter wait a few weeks back, wasn't it?
Rev'd Father Bill White: Mostly retired Parish Priest & former Elementary Headmaster. Lover of God, dogs, most people, joy, tradition, humour & clarity. Legion Padre, theologian, teacher, philosopher, linguist, encourager of hearts & souls & a firm believer in dignity, decency, & duty. A proud Canadian Sinclair with solid Welsh and other heritage.
-
-
19th February 12, 06:21 AM
#12
Re: 120 seconds?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01fa0/01fa01748f66dbe7e358dcbfdd626e558c8dec22" alt="Quote" Originally Posted by tyger
Jeff, how do you prepare those "molasses" for the toast and waffles?
They're good mashed up together with butter and spread in a hot biscuit, too.
--dbh
When given a choice, most people will choose.
-
-
19th February 12, 08:17 AM
#13
Re: 120 seconds?
Well, the 120 second rule just nabbed me for about the third time in 24 hours. Eh, it's worth it for the security, I suppose.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01fa0/01fa01748f66dbe7e358dcbfdd626e558c8dec22" alt="Quote" Originally Posted by piperdbh
They're good mashed up together with butter and spread in a hot biscuit, too.
And that's the second time you've made me hungry, in the last 20 minutes.
-
-
19th February 12, 08:32 AM
#14
Re: 120 seconds?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01fa0/01fa01748f66dbe7e358dcbfdd626e558c8dec22" alt="Quote" Originally Posted by piperdbh
They're good mashed up together with butter and spread in a hot biscuit, too.
Ha! Well, I was really asking Jeff about the mole-asses that he said would shine up, and he said that he liked them on his waffles. I wondered how he fixed them, and he said: "Neat." Straight-up. Now, you are a manly man if you can eat those moleasses thataway.
-
-
19th February 12, 08:36 PM
#15
Re: 120 seconds?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01fa0/01fa01748f66dbe7e358dcbfdd626e558c8dec22" alt="Quote" Originally Posted by Steve Ashton
But its reason is to prevent spammers from 'flooding' the forum with hundreds of junk mail posts before the Moderators can catch them.
So we do have some limits. I'm sorry if these limits are at times 'limiting' but I hope you can understand the reason for them.
I really don't think our members want to log on and have to wade through the viagra ads, the wow gold ads, and the penis enlargement ads, that plague many forums.
Thank you Steve for protecting us from the spammers junk mail posts !!!
Santa Wally
Charter member of Clan Claus Society, Clan Wallace Society
C.W. Howard Santa School Alumni
International Brotherhood of Real Bearded Santas
-
-
20th February 12, 02:57 PM
#16
Re: 120 seconds?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01fa0/01fa01748f66dbe7e358dcbfdd626e558c8dec22" alt="Quote" Originally Posted by Father Bill
Steve, I think it was a shorter wait a few weeks back, wasn't it?
Yes, it was. They just increased it. It used to be 30 seconds or 60 seconds (can't remember for sure - all I know is that it wasn't 120 seconds).
I don't mind that much. Sometimes when I hit submit, it gives me that error, so I go back to the thread and find that my reply is posted. I'm thinking that there's a glitch somewhere between my fingers and the forum server that would be double-posting my replies if not for this feature. So to save myself from the embarrassment of incessant double-posts, the 120 second limit does me a favour.
-
Similar Threads
-
By Kiltedfirepiper in forum Kilts in the Media
Replies: 19
Last Post: 23rd August 06, 08:36 AM
-
By Big Dave in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 7
Last Post: 24th May 06, 10:55 AM
-
By Nick in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 7
Last Post: 29th March 06, 07:44 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks