X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12
  1. #11
    Paul Henry is offline Membership Revoked for repeated rule violations.
    Join Date
    16th January 06
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,351
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The actual size of the sett is often down to the weaver , while it has to have the correct threadcount (whatever that might be) there are often minor little ajustments the weaver might make to enable the tarten to be woven, sometimes slightly increasing or decreasing large colour areas for example.The threadcount does not indicate what size the finished tartan will be , it is a formula for the design, which means if very fine threads are used such as silk the design will be small, and if very large strands are used a very large pattern and proportionally thicker cloth as well will result. It's usually possible to scale up a threadcount to make a larger sett , something that I've used with DC Dalgliesh many times,
    As to why there are differences between the registers I suspect that human error is one reason, whether in the counting of thread of old samples or indeed simple typos might account for quite a lot of the problems
    Last edited by Paul Henry; 7th December 12 at 01:37 AM.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    2nd January 10
    Location
    Lethendy, Perthshire
    Posts
    4,683
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TheBrus View Post
    Thanks for the explanation. I ran this through the ScotWeb tartan design tool, and the difference was remarkable. Why such a difference? Does this account for different sett sizes?
    Did you pick up the fact that the counts were to the half pivot which is the way a weaver records them. Using full counts on the pivot was something introduced by DC Stewart in his Setts and has lead to all sorts of errors over time. Anyone sending a count to a weaver for making up should always to state whether the pivots counts are full or half.

    Paul explained about sett sizes and the need to keep counts proportional. That is not the case in the two I gave. The Wilsons' setting was for plaidng/fine shawls and gave a large sett. Modern manufacturers don't like these as the cloth has less utility and so they tend to cut them, often to the detriment of the original seting IMHO, in order to maximise profit.

    Quote Originally Posted by paulhenry View Post
    As to why there are differences between the registers I suspect that human error is one reason, whether in the counting of thread of old samples or indeed simple typos might account for quite a lot of the problems
    Errors and typos accepted, it's generally a commercial consideration as discribed above.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0