X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 96

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    14th October 10
    Location
    Los Alamos, NM, USA
    Posts
    3,325
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have two thoughts on this subject:

    1. It's your's and, especially, your bride-to-be's wedding. Wear whatever you want. There are no fashion police who will give you a ticket for wearing a "regular" tie with a PC. In future years your wedding pictures will look just as lovely and invoke the same sentimental memories "cum or sans" the bow tie.

    2. If you care enough about fashion tradition, then Jock is correct (as usual). Wear a bow tie or a black argyll jacket with a conventional tie. You will both be so happy (and nervous) on the wedding day that, hopefully, the cloth tie will be the last thing you think about. The vastly more important "ties" are the oaths you will swear during that sacred ceremony. In time the cloth tie will crumble. The sworn tie is immortal.

    Have a great wedding!
    I changed my signature. The old one was too ridiculous.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    22nd September 08
    Location
    Aberdeen/Huntly, Scotland
    Posts
    1,141
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I had occasion once where I wore a regular tie with a Prince Charlie. It really looks weird. Try it once in front of a mirror and you will see what I mean. There's nothig you could do to make it look right. If you want to wear a regular tie then take Jocks suggestion of an Argyle jacket. If you want to wear a PC then wear a bow tie.
    The hielan' man he wears the kilt, even when it's snowin';
    He kens na where the wind comes frae,
    But he kens fine where its goin'.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    27th October 09
    Location
    Kerrville, Texas
    Posts
    5,711
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    1. It's your's and, especially, your bride-to-be's wedding. Wear whatever you want. There are no fashion police who will give you a ticket for wearing a "regular" tie with a PC. In future years your wedding pictures will look just as lovely and invoke the same sentimental memories "cum or sans" the bow tie.
    Yes, but it's also entirely possible that one day he will come to appreciate the proper rules of men's wear, and will then be embarrassed to look at his wedding photos. There are a lot of guys out there who got married in their kilts, not knowing (or not caring) if they were "doing it right", only to look back later and cringe at what they were wearing in their wedding photos. So for that reason, I'd really recommend being as correct and appropriate as possible.

  4. #4
    M. A. C. Newsome is offline
    INACTIVE

    Contributing Tartan Historian
    Join Date
    26th January 05
    Location
    Western NC
    Posts
    5,714
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you have not seen this done before, count your blessings. I see it done frequently and it never looks right to me. Sean Connery is one of the worst offenders.

    I agree with Jock. Go with a black barathea Argyle jacket, worn with or without a 5 button waistcoat. You will also likely find more occasions to wear it after your wedding. Plus you can wear this style of jacket equally well with bow-tie and 3 button formal waistcoat.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    6th February 10
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    8,180
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tobus View Post
    Yes, but it's also entirely possible that one day he will come to appreciate the proper rules of men's wear, and will then be embarrassed to look at his wedding photos. There are a lot of guys out there who got married in their kilts, not knowing (or not caring) if they were "doing it right", only to look back later and cringe at what they were wearing in their wedding photos. So for that reason, I'd really recommend being as correct and appropriate as possible.
    ***

  6. #6
    Join Date
    8th February 04
    Location
    3389 Schuylkill Rd, Spring City, PA 19475
    Posts
    5,854
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tobus View Post
    Yes, but it's also entirely possible that one day he will come to appreciate the proper rules of men's wear, and will then be embarrassed to look at his wedding photos. There are a lot of guys out there who got married in their kilts, not knowing (or not caring) if they were "doing it right", only to look back later and cringe at what they were wearing in their wedding photos. So for that reason, I'd really recommend being as correct and appropriate as possible.
    A BIG ***. I was going to post the exact same thing as it's the same advice I give to customers in the shop.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    14th October 10
    Location
    Los Alamos, NM, USA
    Posts
    3,325
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tobus View Post
    Yes, but it's also entirely possible that one day he will come to appreciate the proper rules of men's wear, and will then be embarrassed to look at his wedding photos. There are a lot of guys out there who got married in their kilts, not knowing (or not caring) if they were "doing it right", only to look back later and cringe at what they were wearing in their wedding photos. So for that reason, I'd really recommend being as correct and appropriate as possible.
    Your point is well taken, but I stand by my two coupled "thoughts".

    If, after N years of marriage, a person is seriously embarrassed by what they were wearing in a picture taken N years ago, when their mindset may have been entirely different, then there are bigger problems lurking than "fashion irregularities". You clearly haven't seen my wedding pictures with my bell bottoms and Nehru jacket.
    I changed my signature. The old one was too ridiculous.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    13th October 10
    Location
    Powell River, BC, Canada
    Posts
    314
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A PC worn with a long tie has always looked wrong to me. I have seen a number of pipe bands that adopted the PC in the 1970s as a uniform jacket, worn usually without a vest and with a long tie. Maybe I'm too traditional, but this always looked to me like a makeshift version of highland dress. Fortunately, most bands that had adopted this style abandoned it by the mid 1980s in favour of the argyll jacket, now most often worn with a 5-button vest. Those few that have persisted with the PC and long tie -- I can think of at least two in my own region -- now look as though they are stuck in a 1970s time warp, as well as looking wrong.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    27th October 09
    Location
    Kerrville, Texas
    Posts
    5,711
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mookien View Post
    If, after N years of marriage, a person is seriously embarrassed by what they were wearing in a picture taken N years ago, when their mindset may have been entirely different, then there are bigger problems lurking than "fashion irregularities".
    Well, I wasn't implying that it meant something would be wrong with the marriage itself! Just that it has happened many times, where people look back at what they were wearing and say, "man, what was I thinking?" It's understandable with fashion trends like the 1970s, but when someone is wearing something incorrectly or inappropriately for the event, that's different. Like white trainers with a tux, for an extreme example.

    At least the OP had the good sense to ask here first so he'd know for sure whether it was appropriate or not. Now, armed with the answer, at least he can make an informed decision one way or the other.

    But on this subject, I would offer a suggestion (and it would be interesting to hear what the rabble have to say about the idea). The usual choices seem to be either a PC with a bowtie, or an Argyll with a long tie. What about a different look that dresses up the Argyll a bit, without going to the level of the PC? One could still wear a long tie with the Argyll/waistcoat, but with a winged collar. I take the inspiration from Downton Abbey. Imagine this, as shown below, but worn with a black Argyll jacket. It hasn't been in style for about a hundred years, but so what? Might be a unique look for a wedding, especially if the bride doesn't like the looks of a bowtie. And it doesn't go to the extreme of a silly ruche tie, either.

    Last edited by Tobus; 29th January 13 at 01:39 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    19th September 12
    Location
    Highland, IN
    Posts
    323
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    To me, that actually looks like a ruche or a different style of cravat.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0