X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 40

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    28th May 11
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    54
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Still rude. If I'd asked 'what do you think?' or 'do you think this looks OK?' or it had been a critical thread about kilt wear, then OK. Or a positive suggestion, like 'if you wear this jacket you'd avoid that space' - again that would be fine.

    But to proffer an unasked negative, even snarky opinion in an unrelated thread, especially with the trigger phrase 'Nothing looks worse than...' (a bit like 'I don't mean to be prejudiced but...' in the uh-oh stakes) then yes, it's rude, whatever you think is 'proper' or correct. In fact, I would say if you think *anything* is proper and correct then politeness should factor in that most highly. Public critical comments will *always* rub people the wrong way. Strange you would not mention it in person as a faux pas, but find the anonymity behind a keyboard much more acceptable? That makes it worse in fact. Classic keyboard warrior, and makes me feel that it was intended as snark and not a friendly comment at all, or an idle comment without thinking.

    As it is, it just makes me self-concious and less likely to wear a kilt now :-( , so I'd respectfully request you keep any future opinions to yourself, and maybe learn some basic internet etiquette.
    Last edited by fingertrouble; 9th July 13 at 07:31 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    7th February 11
    Location
    London, Canada
    Posts
    9,602
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    CAUTION: Tripping Hazard

    Let's be kind fellows.
    Rev'd Father Bill White: Mostly retired Parish Priest & former Elementary Headmaster. Lover of God, dogs, most people, joy, tradition, humour & clarity. Legion Padre, theologian, teacher, philosopher, linguist, encourager of hearts & souls & a firm believer in dignity, decency, & duty. A proud Canadian Sinclair with solid Welsh and other heritage.

  3. The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to Father Bill For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    Join Date
    16th August 12
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    207
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    And back to the Opera...who played Figaro?

  5. #4
    Join Date
    7th December 09
    Location
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    Posts
    451
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Zachary Nelson played Figaro.
    But, more good news to be had!
    While "shopping while kilted" I was approached by two extremely well dressed 20 somethings. It turns out that they are in the Opera's apprentice program and he has 4 different kilts to wear (he is in the chorus), at La Donna del Lago which opens this weekend. They stated that this opera is rarely performed, is by Rossini, and is based on Sir Walter Scott's " Lady of the Lake".

    Looks as if we will have to quickly scrounge up some more cash and see if there are any more tickets available.
    Si Deus, quis contra? Spence and Brown on my mother's side, Johnston from my father, proud member of Clan MacDuff!

  6. #5
    Join Date
    9th March 13
    Location
    Croydon. UK
    Posts
    262
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I went to La donna del largo last month at Covent Garden and loved it. It does need lead singers with formidable technique though to manage all that coloratura. More for Handel lovers than Puccini lovers.

    Years ago Marilyn Horne playing the young male lover in La donna sounded wonderful in the music and looked silly in a kilt. Fortunately, Daniela Barcellona this time carried off her kilt (and her contralto coluratura).

  7. #6
    Join Date
    17th April 12
    Location
    Franklin, Indiana
    Posts
    223
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Excellent display of passive aggression, there, man.

    That's why I was short and jocular about the comment, just to let you know. You took it and ran in a different direction.

    Don't shoot the messenger.

    It's not my fault. It's the fashion rule.

    You don't show shirt between waistcoat and pants/kilt. It's not RUDE. It's the way things are.

    You can get all persnickity if you want, but if you forget yourself and wear a hat inside, wouldn't you want someone to mention it to you so you can take it off before everyone takes their opinion of you? That's all that was done here.

    More and more people these days don't seem to understand how basic fashion works. For example, look at all the people who think "suit = formal". Suits are "business casual." BLACK TIE is formal. A tux is SEMI-formal.

    That's just the way it is.
    Last edited by AJBryant; 10th July 13 at 11:55 AM.

  8. The Following User Says 'Aye' to AJBryant For This Useful Post:


  9. #7
    Join Date
    9th March 13
    Location
    Croydon. UK
    Posts
    262
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I thought we were talking about opera. OK, whose going to Wozzek? It was on at the English National Opera last season and is due at Covent Garden later this year with the wonderful Simon Keenlyside as the put upon central character. I could cope with twelve tone scales for him. Any comments?

    (Discussions of waistcoats are tangential, and discussions about discussions of waistcoats are not only irrelevant, but as Father Bill wisely hints possibly totally destructive.)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0