sloan is a sept of which clan?

[duke_19_62]

After a quick Google search I found http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb....sloan/coa.html It talks about the Sloans in Scotland, England and elsewhere in Europe. It also shows the Scottish and English Coats of Arms.

[ctbuchanan]

This is from the Surname Database:

This long-established surname, widespread in Scotland and Northern Ireland, is an Anglicized form of the Old Gaelic personal name "Sluaghadhan", leader of a military expedition, from "sluaghadh", expedition, raid. The Chronicles of the Picts (inhabitants of North East Scotland) tells us that one Sluagadach went forth to Rome circa 966, and circa 1128; Slogadadh was the name of a leader of the bishop of St. Andrew's host. In the process of Anglicization "Sluaghadh(an)" has acquired many variant forms including: Sloan, Sloane, Slo(y)ne, Slowan, Sloyan, Slowey and Slo(e)y, the latter two examples are more specifically from "O'Sluaghaidh", descendant of Sluaghadh. Many references to these names appear in ancient annals of Ireland prior to the year 1200, but are very infrequent until the 17th Century. Among the earliest recorded namebearers in Scotland are William Slowane, who held a tenement near Dalkeith, Midlothian, in 1504, and John Sloane, who had legal possession of land in the parish of Traquair, Peeblesshire, in 1565. The 1659 Petty's "Census" of all Ireland lists Slowan as one of the most numerous names in the barony of Newry, County Down, and in February 1769, the marriage of Ann Sloan to Samuel Spencer was recorded at Lisburn, County Antrim. A Coat of Arms granted to the Sloan family depicts a red lion rampant, crowned with a gold antique crown, on a silver shield, the Crest being an eagle displayed proper. The first recorded spelling of the family name is shown to be that of Maelpatrick O'Sluaghadhaigh, or O'Sluaghaidh, which was dated 1015, in the "Annals of the Four Masters", during the reign of Malachy 11, High King of Ireland, 1014 - 1019. Surnames became necessary when governments introduced personal taxation. In England this was known as Poll Tax. Throughout the centuries, surnames in every country have continued to "develop" often leading to astonishing variants of the original spelling.

Also the National Trust name distribution map for the name Sloan shows it heavily concentrated on the west coast of Scotland (Kilmarnock in particular)
http://gbnames.publicprofiler.org/Ma...y=GB&type=name

[Theyoungkiltman]

So I could wear the galloway district correct?

[Chas]

So I could wear the galloway district correct?

I see no reason why not.

[Ron Abbott]

So I could wear the galloway district correct?

You could wear McLeod of Lewis, the Barclay, the American Bicentennial, or add 'ranger' to your name, become a 'sloan ranger' and wear the Harrods of Knightsbridge tartan!

Wear whatever tartan you like.

Most of the tartan 'MacName' thing is all romanticised, 'make believe' anyway. On the positive side, it's sure made money for Scottish industry and commerce and I do like wearing the kilt!

[ctbuchanan]

To leapfrog the cynical point of view. Yes, I believe that the Galloway tartan would be a perfectly legitimate choice for you. You could even go with Ayrshire as your family name seems to be well concentrated there as well. As an American without a clear clan connection you are on the right track choosing a tartan that has some historical connection to your name and would have some personal meaning to you. The choice is yours, is a personal one, and if I were you I'd be proud wearing either.

[ctbuchanan]

Most of the tartan 'MacName' thing is all romanticised, 'make believe' anyway. On the positive side, it's sure made money for Scottish industry and commerce and I do like wearing the kilt!

That is certainly a pretty shallow view of things. And while we all agree that the tartan name connections were all contrived at one time, that was started over 200 years ago. I would think that the length and depth of the conversations contained within the Xmarks forum would demonstrate that the current view has evolved well beyond the 'make believe'. Many Clan Chiefs (a well established and legal entity) would take great exception to your contention that named tartans are irrelevant. And I know of many, many of my friends and acquaintances (and myself included) who take great pride in the tartans that they wear regardless of how it all got started.

[Theyoungkiltman]

i am sort of in the middle as far as that. i believe that you should wear a tartan that you have a hereditary or bestowed right to in most formal situations but in a casual or at-home situation i do not think it matters much.

[TheOfficialBren]

It could be like my surname, Colbert (say the "t"). Originally found in Galloway but also Ireland, England, and other parts of Scotland.

Truthfully, my friend, most Scots have always been outside the clan system even when it was a political entity.

[Nathan]

Most of the tartan 'MacName' thing is all romanticised, 'make believe' anyway. On the positive side, it's sure made money for Scottish industry and commerce and I do like wearing the kilt!

It's not quite that simple. Some of them were lifted from portraits of prominent figures within the clan, others were taken from artifacts etc... Certainly they wouldn't have been considered clan tartans at the time of the given portrait etc... and a lot were created by Wilson's or the Sobieski Stuarts but they have come to visually symbolize the ties that bind. Usually clan/family ties but also associations, districts, football team, religion etc...

As mentioned by ctbuchanan, the tradition is now over 200 years old and is real and established. As Father Bill is fond of saying, there's no need to wear another person's name tag.

I own four kilts all in MacDonald setts. I would also wear a tartan with which I identified such as Maple Leaf, the Government tartan, Nova Scotia or Cape Breton but I would never wear a kilt in another clan's tartan even one of the several Highland names further up my family tree unless it was being worn as part of a uniform.