-
15th September 15, 08:43 AM
#1
 Originally Posted by Wareyin
I think that Weddings and Funerals are as formal as I will ever need to dress. But I thank you for the warning, should I somehow ever find myself invited to a white tie event.
Most weddings and apart from State funerals, nearly all funerals are not formal, in the context of non formal and formal events.
We in the UK go by the definitions of casual, smart and formal/dress occasions and the baffling definition of "semi formal" does not exist. Casual covers anything from beech wear to going to the pub for a quiet dram. Smart goes from going to the pub with the in laws for the first time, to weddings and funerals where one would wear a lounge/business suit(tweed jacket in kilt terms), then we have formal/dress events.
Each of the first two pretty vague definitions can be dressed up or down depending on how one feels and experience , it is only when we get to formal/dress attire are conventions rather more rigid and expectations of others are to be considered rather more seriosly.
Last edited by Jock Scot; 15th September 15 at 10:09 AM.
" Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the adherence of idle minds and minor tyrants". Field Marshal Lord Slim.
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to Jock Scot For This Useful Post:
-
15th September 15, 09:18 AM
#2
 Originally Posted by Jock Scot
Most weddings and apart from State funerals, nearly all funerals are not formal, in the context of non formal and formal events.
We in the UK go by the definitions of casual, smart and formal/dress occasions and the baffling definition of "semi formal" does not exist. Casual covers anything from beech wear to going to the pup for a quiet dram. Smart goes from going to the pub with the in laws for the first time, to weddings and funerals where one would wear a lounge/business suit(tweed jacket in kilt terms), then we have formal/dress events.
Each of the first two pretty vague definitions can be dressed up or down depending on how one feels and experience , it is only when we get to formal/dress attire are conventions rather more rigid and expectations of others are to be considered rather more seriosly.
Two countries, separated by a common language. 
In my experience here, formal includes anywhere where people will be expected to wear a suit. Tuxedo is black tie, and I honestly don't know what white tie would be, other than a tuxedo with a white tie. Casual seems the same, and semi-formal seems to equal smart.
-
-
15th September 15, 09:32 AM
#3
AHAAA! It took a while to get there, but I thought that might be the problem. Its not a new one and I can recognise the symptoms pretty well now! 
It may help you to understand kilt attire better if you understand two basic things. Firstly you need to divorce American terminology from British and secondly you need to understand that there are no exact comparisons between dress definitions of kilt attire and saxon wear. A tad confusing for a start, but as many here have found out to their benefit, it does help one no end to understand the finer points of kilt attire.
" Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the adherence of idle minds and minor tyrants". Field Marshal Lord Slim.
-
The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to Jock Scot For This Useful Post:
-
15th September 15, 10:04 AM
#4
... and also to know that Canadian English isn't the same as American.
Rev'd Father Bill White: Mostly retired Parish Priest & former Elementary Headmaster. Lover of God, dogs, most people, joy, tradition, humour & clarity. Legion Padre, theologian, teacher, philosopher, linguist, encourager of hearts & souls & a firm believer in dignity, decency, & duty. A proud Canadian Sinclair with solid Welsh and other heritage.
-
The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to Father Bill For This Useful Post:
-
22nd September 15, 08:22 PM
#5
 Originally Posted by Father Bill
... and also to know that Canadian English isn't the same as American.
From my experience wit Scot's regiments Scot's English isn't like English English either.
De Oppresso Liber
-
-
15th September 15, 10:15 AM
#6
 Originally Posted by Jock Scot
AHAAA! It took a while to get there, but I thought that might be the problem. Its not a new one and I can recognise the symptoms pretty well now!
It may help you to understand kilt attire better if you understand two basic things. Firstly you need to divorce American terminology from British and secondly you need to understand that there are no exact comparisons between dress definitions of kilt attire and saxon wear. A tad confusing for a start, but as many here have found out to their benefit, it does help one no end to understand the finer points of kilt attire.
Exactly!!! The 10 looks threads and a few others have been excellent guides. Yet the topic of shoes is not necessarily well covered in pictures, as the OP notes. For myself, I have basically decided that if it looks like it belongs under a suit and I can give them a good shine, then the shoes fit under the kilt for business and formal dress. These include an oxblood brogue and black toe-cap. I've seen patent leather on others for formal in the kilt. Looks sharp, just not for me. I wear the black toe-cap with my tux, too; parade gloss polished.
-
The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to Taskr For This Useful Post:
-
15th September 15, 10:32 AM
#7
Aye, and that shine is an important requirement.
Rev'd Father Bill White: Mostly retired Parish Priest & former Elementary Headmaster. Lover of God, dogs, most people, joy, tradition, humour & clarity. Legion Padre, theologian, teacher, philosopher, linguist, encourager of hearts & souls & a firm believer in dignity, decency, & duty. A proud Canadian Sinclair with solid Welsh and other heritage.
-
The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to Father Bill For This Useful Post:
-
22nd September 15, 08:08 PM
#8
Admittedly, the following is a pretty strict traditionalistic view, and is applicable to Saxon dress... But, it's important to understand the codes that most of us supposedly follow in Saxon dress to perhaps better understand the differences between it and Highland dress. Pictures are all from Allen Edmonds because they make a lot of styles and it's best to use all one maker for examples to highlight the differences in style, not the brand's design. If a shoe doesn't appear here, it's for good reason: Either I truncated it for brevity (like all the styles of Blucher or Derby), or it's not a traditional style of shoe for smart Saxon dress (most slip-on shoes, sneakers, and workman's footwear).
Opera pumps (aka court shoes): Looks like a patent leather pump with a small grosgrain bow over the instep. Extremely formal and largely extinct, having been overtaken by the:
Cap-Toe Oxford (http://www.allenedmonds.com/shoes/me...enue&start=1): The correct shoe for almost any smart dressing (especially if highly polished). An Oxford is not just any lace-up shoe, but one with closed facings (facings being the bits where the eyelets are, closed meaning they don't really open up much and are joined at the bottom).
Medallion Oxford (http://www.allenedmonds.com/shoes/me...r=1055#start=3) An oxford with no cap-toe, but a brogued (perforated) medallion (design) on the toe. The facing style here is an Adelaide facing, as opposed to the Balmoral facings in the last example.
Semi-Brogue (http://www.allenedmonds.com/strand-c...5_color=1626): A cap-toe Oxford shoe with broguing (the perforated patterns on the toe and seams). A wee bit less formal due to the presence of broguing (perforation) and gimping (serrated edges on some pieces of leather)
Full Brogue(http://www.allenedmonds.com/shoes/me...215_color=6202) Technically a casual shoe, but accepted with country-style (tweed, patch pockets) suits.
Plain-toe Blucher (http://www.allenedmonds.com/shoes/me...sz=18&start=67) Technically a more casual shoe than a closed-face brogue. Typically accepted with odd jacket and trousers (a coat and trousers which complement each other, but are not a suit). "Blucher" refers to the style of facing, which in this case is a type of open facing, meaning the two sides of the facings are separate and can open up quite a bit. As a testament to how much of a shoe geek you have to be to sort out all the different facing styles and their names, even the manufacturer mis-indentifies this shoe as a Derby.
Plain-toe Derby (http://www.allenedmonds.com/shoes/co...015_color=3016) Similar in formality and application to the Plain-toe Blucher, but with Derby facings.
From then on, the formality decreases with the amount of broguing and other decoration until we reach the:
Split-toe Blucher: (http://www.allenedmonds.com/shoes/me...sz=18&start=53) Which is pretty darned casual, and something of a conundrum: passes as a "dress shoe" to most, but is, in fact, one of the most casual lace-up shoes around
Loafer (Do I really need an example?) Very casual. If worn with a jacket at all, the jacket should be definitely a casual jacket (like a sportscoat... a blazer would even be a bit too formal, strictly speaking) and possibly a bit battered from many admirable years of service above a pair of bluchers or brogues. Most at home with stuff like sweaters, which, like the loafer, are relaxation clothes.
And last, but certainly not least, the shoe that (at least in the US) nobody knows what to do with:
The Gunboat Brogue aka Longwing Blucher (http://www.allenedmonds.com/macneil-...=18&start=20): Worn with suits and business dress in the US for some time, the gunboat is accepted as a valid choice with such attire. Strictly speaking, the open facings, heavy broguing, chunky lasts, and double soles make it a workhorse casual shoe. In the US, it's your choice, but it is seen as a conservative, perhaps even stodgy choice of shoe.
Again, the above is an extremely strict, old-school, and mostly extinct breakdown, but it should hopefully serve to establish what all the terms mean, and what shoes are theoretically casual, dressy, or formal. You'll also note that the terms for different facing styles can help explain some linguistic differences between members, although it will always baffle me that virtually any lace-up shoe is called an Oxford, sometimes even if said shoe is really a Derby, Blucher, or even a sneaker. Dress boots follow the same hierarchy based on facing style, last slimness, and embellishment (although they are a somewhat daring choice)
Overall, Highland dress is:
1. Much more brogue-friendly, with brogues being often worn with the equivalent of a smart suit or even the equivalent of Morning Dress.
2. Much less boot-friendly (at least nowadays), with boots really only being seen in old portraits and photographs.
Postcript: This is what happens when you have too much time on your hands and take perhaps too much interest in clothes.
Last edited by Livonian; 22nd September 15 at 08:18 PM.
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to Livonian For This Useful Post:
-
23rd September 15, 04:55 AM
#9
 Originally Posted by Livonian
<snipped for brevity>
Again, the above is an extremely strict, old-school, and mostly extinct breakdown, but it should hopefully serve to establish what all the terms mean, and what shoes are theoretically casual, dressy, or formal. You'll also note that the terms for different facing styles can help explain some linguistic differences between members, although it will always baffle me that virtually any lace-up shoe is called an Oxford, sometimes even if said shoe is really a Derby, Blucher, or even a sneaker. Dress boots follow the same hierarchy based on facing style, last slimness, and embellishment (although they are a somewhat daring choice)
Overall, Highland dress is:
1. Much more brogue-friendly, with brogues being often worn with the equivalent of a smart suit or even the equivalent of Morning Dress.
2. Much less boot-friendly (at least nowadays), with boots really only being seen in old portraits and photographs.
Postcript: This is what happens when you have too much time on your hands and take perhaps too much interest in clothes.
This was quite an interesting post. First of all, thank you for your effort. That said, I don't really understand the difference between a Derby and a Blucher. I think I will stick with my (obviously limited) understanding, and wear my black wingtips any time I am dressing up.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks