-
21st October 15, 11:19 PM
#1
The TGS is a good little book for what it was, an attempt to prove a basic guide to understanding tartan. In essence it was a layman's version of D.C. Stewart's Setts of the Scottish Tartans. Scarlett was a long term friend, student and collaborator of Stewart.
Both books are slightly dated and subsequent research (much of it unpublished) refined/contradicted some of the statements in both.
-
The Following 3 Users say 'Aye' to figheadair For This Useful Post:
-
22nd October 15, 04:16 AM
#2
I became a pretty good tartanspotter after working for a few years at a Highland outfitter.
One of my jobs was to stock a huge rack of tartan neckties. A shipment of ties would come in from Lochcarron and I had to organise them on the rack. I got good at immediately recognising the 500 or so tartans we kept in stock.
That's been nearly 30 years ago and memory fades but even now when I see a tartan the name will often come to mind.
Proud Mountaineer from the Highlands of West Virginia; son of the Revolution and Civil War; first Europeans on the Guyandotte
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to OC Richard For This Useful Post:
-
22nd October 15, 05:10 AM
#3
I saw the book and picked up a copy for a few dollars. I have not read the whole thing yet, but I like the author's writing style. I expect many books get contradicted by further research, but I assume the system of tartan "sorting" can still be used and relied upon. Thanks, all, for the additional info.
m'll
Some take the high road and some take the low road. Who's in the gutter? MacLowlife
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to MacLowlife For This Useful Post:
-
22nd October 15, 09:13 AM
#4
 Originally Posted by MacLowlife
I saw the book and picked up a copy for a few dollars. I have not read the whole thing yet, but I like the author's writing style. I expect many books get contradicted by further research, but I assume the system of tartan "sorting" can still be used and relied upon. Thanks, all, for the additional info.
m'll
Absolutely. The only thing that's really changed since both authors wrote is the introduction of an increasing number of non-traditional colours and shades. The key is to reduce them to their base terminology; red, blue, green etc., qualified by light and dark and, where necessary, describe the actual shade.
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to figheadair For This Useful Post:
-
22nd October 15, 09:45 AM
#5
 Originally Posted by figheadair
Absolutely. The only thing that's really changed since both authors wrote is the introduction of an increasing number of non-traditional colours and shades. The key is to reduce them to their base terminology; red, blue, green etc., qualified by light and dark and, where necessary, describe the actual shade.
I seem to remember reading somewhere that the introduction of these non-tradional colours to tartan was described as a "modern conceit".
" Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the adherence of idle minds and minor tyrants". Field Marshal Lord Slim.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks