This comment in the above post caught my eye -
"A Coat of Arms granted to the family is a silver shield,"
Can some of our more knowledgeable members shed some light on this for me? The Court of The Lord Lyon states quite plainly -
"There is a widespread misconception that a family or a clan can have a family or clan Coat of Arms. Many heraldic and clan web sites and other media suggest that a person has the right to use the family or clan Arms. This is completely incorrect.
A Coat of Arms belongs only to one individual person and can only be used by that person and no one else. In order for a person to be able to use a Coat of Arms it is necessary for that individual person to apply for a personal Coat of Arms to be granted to him or her."
Am I misreading something?
Steve Ashton
www.freedomkilts.com
Skype (webcam enabled) thewizardofbc
I wear the kilt because: Swish + Swagger = Swoon.
Bookmarks