X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Results 1 to 9 of 9

Threaded View

  1. #9
    Join Date
    21st May 08
    Location
    Inverness-shire, Scotland & British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    3,886
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by figheadair View Post
    The trouble with the Duke's, or any other chief's, pronouncement is that they can only state what they recognise should be used by their clansmen. Stating that there is no Dress, Hunting, Campbell-Simpson etc., tartan is factually incorrect and akin to saying that the sun doesn't rise in the morning. Life is far more nuanced.
    Yes, of course, Peter. The OP's question, however, was about precedents regarding recognition of existing tartans by a chief. Argyll made his statement only in that respect. He said that the Scottish Tartans Authority (remember, this was a few years ago) and Lord Lyon were archivists and historians, but that recognition attached to a name fell only to the chief of that name.

  2. The Following User Says 'Aye' to ThistleDown For This Useful Post:


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0