"Free" photo sites?
Computer memory is getting cheaper but it and "the cloud" still cost something. Picture files are big and getting bigger with higher resolution cameras. Photobucket started out free with ads. I am just wondering if we are setting ourselves up for "photobucket ransom" part two by using them.
I really feel sorry for those that thought storing pictures any where in the digital form was actually "archiving for posterity".
If the Photobucket experience has shown us nothing else, it has shown that we must keep control of our own photos and make backups often. Delete, intentional or accidental, is only a keystroke away. Fires, disk crashes and ransom hackers are other ways to lose these virtual archives.
The old picture on film format had a real advantage of creating two copies once developed and printed (a negative and a print) that still slowly degrades over decades. But can be seen a century from now without any equipment.
Digital prints, especially those printed with a printer that uses plastic metallic dye "toner" powder that is then melted into the paper may last longer without light and water degrading them. We have learned from the old Polaroid prints and ink jet printers of today, both using organic dyes, just how fast time and light fades them. It's easy to check your dye type, just leave a print face up on your cars dashboard for a few days and see how fast the sunlight fades it.
Last edited by tundramanq; 2nd April 18 at 07:57 AM.
slàinte mhath, Chuck
Originally Posted by MeghanWalker,In answer to Goodgirlgoneplaids challenge:
"My sporran is bigger and hairier than your sporran"
Pants is only a present tense verb here. I once panted, but it's all cool now.
Bookmarks