Attaching the Stabilizer

[The Wizard of BC]

From a strictly engineering standpoint the left strap hole is a weak point in the garment.
It is quite common to see the left strap hole torn out or where repairs have been needed.

Heck if you have a kilt with a strap hole, just grab it and pull. You will see what I mean.



So I have chosen to eliminate the left hole.

With the left strap hole in the kilt the stabilizer must stop at the strap hole. This can mean the the aprons of the kilt do not have any horizontal strentgh behind them so the fabric may be subject to distortion over time.



The basic idea behind the Contemporary style kilt is to make it as strong as possible to resist these stress points. The Contemporary kilt is designed to be worn far more often than the Iconic kilt and under the daily conditions which put more wear and stress on the garment.
I extend the stabilizer the full width of the kilt.

I had this kilt make by a well known name come in to my shop for repair and this is what I found under the liner.



And this one which is sold at a premium price and called by the maker "a premium Traditionally made kilt" that has no stitching at all. The interfacing is simply fused inside the kilt. This kilt has one single layer of interfacing made of three pieces which which are cut to take the curve of the back but not sewn at all.



And the reason my stabilizer is on one side of the interfacing than the other is all due to how I make them and not if one way is better or worse than the other.
I construct my interfacing and stabilizer as one single, integated unit. It is installed in the kilt as a unit.
Many kilt makers construct the interfacing out of three or more separate pieces and simply tack the pieces together. It is quite common to see kilts that have failed or distorted because there is no unified strength to the garment.

And I use a fabric for my stabilizer that has a fusible backing. I set the stabilize with heat that holds it in place like pins until I can sew it in place. It is just quick and woks well for the way I make my kilts and for no other reason. (I never rely on the fusible as the final fastening and never use fusible where it will 'telegraph' through to the outer layers. It is just used like pins to hold something in place until it can be stitched.)

It does not really matter if you install the stabilizer or the interfacing first. What does matter is if the straps and buckles are sewn all the way through all the layers for strength.

[Tobinn]

...and from an appearance standpoint the order of the layering of the stabilizer and interfacing doesn't matter since it will all be concealed with a liner.

...does it save any work to stitch the stabilizer and interface together first and then sew to the kilt?

...if I understand it, one could simply not make a buttonhole rather placing the buckle on the inside of the kilt; strapping the kilt on the left strap would be inside the kilt and only the two buckles and straps visible on the right hand side of the kilt...

...when you say that the stabilizer and interface and attached to the full width of the kilt I'm picturing these components literally extending from the edge of the apron to the far other edge of the underapron - the full width of the kilt. In TAoK it looks as though the interface canvas is three separate pieces - one for the under apron, one for the apron and one for the pleats essentially stretching from edge to edge (almost) and the stabilizer is from inverse pleat to buttonhole - basically just covering the pleats. I think I understand the purpose for each component. I wonder why one wouldn't just cut the stabilizer the same length as the canvas interface? For that matter, why cut three separate pieces for the canvas interface? Perhaps it's because of the curve of the kilt in the pleats?

...by fusible stabilizer I picture something like stitch witch. Not stitch witch itself mind you but that sort of iron on product...