Waistband height utility kilt

[Hologenicman]

In Scotland I have never seen anyone wearing a "Utikilt" so can someone explain to me why do they call it a utikilt? It is not a Kilt it is a tunic similar to a roman soldier.
The popularity of the Scottish kilt has produced several spin offs. Leather kilts, Plain coloured woollen Kilts, Tweed Kilts and Kilts made with patterns such as thistles or the Scottish St Andrews flag. These are all Kilts. The material may be different but the construction of the garment is the same as the traditional kilt. Nothing added and nothing removed.

The line is however drawn when a manufacturer changes the fundamental construction. The Utikilt adds integrated pockets: The pleats are too wide and do not appear to be stitched up to the waist and the amount of material used is far less than would be used in a traditional Kilt. The cross over front apron is also not the same. Because of these changes it stops being a kilt and becomes a tunic. If the manufacturer of this tunic had wanted to keep it as a Kilt they should have added the pockets as a detachable over apron (see British army regular issue 1914 – 1918). They should also have stuck to the traditional way that a proper Kilt is made.

Words are important because they convey a differentiation. A waist coat is not called a jacket because it is different. Breeches are not called trousers or is it pants in America? Shoes and boots are different so a Kilt is not a tunic.

True, a utilikilt is not a traditional kilt by far.

As I understand it, they were invented in 1999 in Seattle, Washington near me. They have no tradition and truly no particular rules of wear.

I can fully understand how that can rub a true kiltsman the wrong way, but as an American it fits my attutude and needs very well. The utilikilt takes a tried and true concept and evolves it into a modern adaptation that server a broad spectrum of uses and situations that would be disrespectful of a traditional kilt. Americans take things and adapt them to serve current needs without holding on to the traditions quite as strongly albeit keeping the name for reference to its origins...

If I understand correctly, the "traditional" kilt is actually an evolution from the Great Kilt worn pleated from a single cloth without any stitching. It is an evolution for function and convenience however it has stayed truer to tradition since it has direct lineage.

Stay Proud,
John L>