-
24th January 05, 05:20 PM
#1
The Press had spoken! Kilts are for Hetro!!!
Got this link off the monthly Utilikilts newsletter
http://www.wweek.com/story.php?story=5895
-
-
24th January 05, 05:26 PM
#2
That was an interesting article Raphael, I do know of several guys who paint their toenails and say that if women want to look pretty, why can't guys? However, calling them Gay Heterosexuals I am not sure they would go for it, but who knows
Glen McGuire
A Life Lived in Fear, Is a Life Half Lived.
-
-
24th January 05, 05:31 PM
#3
Eventhough I knew about that Utilikilts do a lot of Pride Festivals around Canada and the US, I never realised that how big they are with the Gay Communities. Still, that doesn't bother me a bit at all. and I always though Utilikilts belong to all mem regardless of ethnicit, colour, or sexual orientation(s)!!
-
-
24th January 05, 05:37 PM
#4
I've been painted as "metro" by my friends for quite some time now, and hey, the ladies love it! I don't think they quite got the term explained very well in that article.
-
-
24th January 05, 06:11 PM
#5
I'm a "gay heterosexual male", well I'm gay most of the time, except when I'm unhappy, but kilts make me feel gay even when i am unhappy..
sheeesh, what are they doing with the English language!!
-
-
24th January 05, 06:54 PM
#6
I was a bit of a slob when I wore pants and I'm a bit of a slob now that I wear kilts. Clothes do not make the man.
-
-
25th January 05, 04:59 AM
#7
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01fa0/01fa01748f66dbe7e358dcbfdd626e558c8dec22" alt="Quote" Originally Posted by Graham
.................................................. ...................................
sheeesh, what are they doing with the English language!!
My thoughts exactly, Graham. There was little in that article that I could actually comprehend! I've had to rely on getting the gist of it.
[B][I][U]No. of Kilts[/U][/I][/B][I]:[/I] 102.[I] [B]"[U][B]Title[/B]"[/U][/B][/I]: Lord Hamish Bicknell, Laird of Lochaber / [B][U][I]Life Member:[/I][/U][/B] The Scottish Tartans Authority / [B][U][I]Life Member:[/I][/U][/B] The Royal Scottish Country Dance Society / [U][I][B]Member:[/B][/I][/U] The Ardbeg Committee / [I][B][U]My NEW Photo Album[/U]: [/B][/I][COLOR=purple]Sadly, and with great regret, it seems my extensive and comprehensive album may now have been lost forever![/COLOR]/
-
-
25th January 05, 05:48 AM
#8
I have never understood the use of the term "gay" to describe homosexuals. As for the article, to me, it is just meaningless babble. No point is made, supported or refuted. It is full of journalistic jargon which is meant to exclude rather than include.
Casey
-
-
26th January 05, 03:02 PM
#9
very interestig,thanx for posting
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks