-
4th September 05, 04:40 PM
#1
Up front...this one is long winded.....sorry.....
While I am all for preserving history and what it has meant to the development of today’s society I’m not a slave to it. History is just that – the stories of the past and how today’s society has been created. If one is a slave to history and the idea that it should be preserved with no progression then one is doomed to repeat the mistakes of the past. Today’s society (with all of it’s wrongs and rights) is simply a product of history and we can hope a learning experience along the path of civilized development.
I am not a reenactor but I really appreciate those who are. They preserve a vital link to the past that reminds us all who we are and where we came from. As it should be…. we should never forget our roots so that we never repeat past mistakes…. alas as humanity does too often.
A garment? Kilts are part of my heritage and as so in today’s society I dare to wear them. And can get away with it. Hopefully all of us daring to break out of the norm will do more than just bring on a form of “new” dress to the western world but perhaps might make some slight bit of change in other ways of thinking.
As I sit here writing this bit of fluff I’m wearing a SportKilt in the HotLava design. This is in no way, shape or form a “traditional” kilt and for the second time in one day the traditionalists on this board may need to scrape themselves off the floor or clean their screens (really, no offence is intended. At all.) To my way of thinking we all tend to think out of the box in one way or another – some just don’t want to deal with trousers any more than need be, others want to preserve their heritage and others still just want to be cutting edge with what they wear. (And be comfortable) I’m somewhere in a combination of the first two (and what the heck being in number three the first time in my life [at age 42] might be nice too).
Gentlemen, history is an ever-changing story and to my thinking preservation of it and respect for it are extremely important. However JUST as important is a respect for what is to come and the responsibility we all have to make sure that we as a culture adapt to the coming times so that all mankind has a future to look forward to (as well as a preserved past to reflect upon).
Ok, sorry. This got way too long winded and I apologize. Just some of my thoughts on the subject.
Dee
Ferret ad astra virtus
-
-
4th September 05, 05:33 PM
#2
My observation is that people equate kilt wearing to the Romantic hero of yore. They do not see the bloodshed, the warfare and the like that all that romanticism entails. In otherwords people only want to see the goodness that comes out in the kilt wearer.
Glen McGuire
A Life Lived in Fear, Is a Life Half Lived.
-
-
4th September 05, 05:57 PM
#3
Everything I do is manly. Haven't had any problems with anyone misinterpreting that.
Ron
Ol' Macdonald himself, a proud son of Skye and Cape Breton Island
Lifetime Member STA. Two time winner of Utilikiltarian of the Month.
"I'll have a kilt please, a nice hand sewn tartan, 16 ounce Strome. Oh, and a sporran on the side, with a strap please."
-
-
4th September 05, 06:48 PM
#4
Painting in broad strokes, it is easy to see why and how a 17th and 18th century Highlander would have been a rough character. But, I am sure there was a degree of kindness, compassion and hospitality among their ranks and within their communities (Same as the Vikings and Normans that brought the kilt to the British Isles and introduced it to the Anglo-Saxons that had settled there after the Romans departed).
Regardless, I believe the point is that these kilted warriors (the Vikings/Normans and Highlanders) could be seen as the original "rugged individualists," often feared and admired by their peers and enemies. As such, they were free to do as they pleased and held their heads high in the face of critics and naysayers, thumbing their noses at those that would object to their lifestyle and traditions.
However you see it, those that choose to wear a kilt, at some level, are carrying on that warrior spirit and keeping the tradition alive, whether they wear a clan tartan, a khaki UK or a lava red Sportkilt.
-
-
4th September 05, 07:32 PM
#5
[sic]
However you see it, those that choose to wear a kilt, at some level, are carrying on that warrior spirit and keeping the tradition alive, whether they wear a clan tartan, a khaki UK or a lava red Sportkilt.[/QUOTE]
(ok I screwed up: the above should be credited to MotorMan4Life)
I could not have possibly said it better!!! My hat is off to everyone here for whatever reason you are wearing the kilt or even lurking around trying to find an excuse. I cannot encourage the lurkers enough to take the plunge and just see what it is like to go out for your first time kilted. It's an experience that you have to er.......experience to understand.
Gentlemen, just DO IT! You'll never regret it.
Sorry, this probably should have been posted in the "newbie" section. Oh, well.
Moderators: Please feel free to move this one. :-)
Last edited by starbkjrus; 4th September 05 at 07:36 PM.
Dee
Ferret ad astra virtus
-
-
5th September 05, 01:22 PM
#6
[QUOTE=motorman4life]Painting in broad strokes, it is easy to see why and how a 17th and 18th century Highlander would have been a rough character. But, I am sure there was a degree of kindness, compassion and hospitality among their ranks and within their communities (Same as the Vikings and Normans that brought the kilt to the British Isles and introduced it to the Anglo-Saxons that had settled there after the Romans departed).
Where did you get this snippit of info, if you refering to the sagas I think you need more evidence to support your line of thought.
Sorry for being off topic but evidence I sought out suggests that vikings and saxons did not wear kilts.
-
-
5th September 05, 02:11 PM
#7
[QUOTE=Ranald]
 Originally Posted by motorman4life
Painting in broad strokes, it is easy to see why and how a 17th and 18th century Highlander would have been a rough character. But, I am sure there was a degree of kindness, compassion and hospitality among their ranks and within their communities (Same as the Vikings and Normans that brought the kilt to the British Isles and introduced it to the Anglo-Saxons that had settled there after the Romans departed).
Where did you get this snippit of info, if you refering to the sagas I think you need more evidence to support your line of thought.
Sorry for being off topic but evidence I sought out suggests that vikings and saxons did not wear kilts.
Which one were you after? Kindness and compassion for each people, I think we can document. The clothing migration has already been covered and I don't think that's as well supported.
-
-
5th September 05, 05:53 PM
#8
 Originally Posted by Ranald
Where did you get this snippit of info, if you refering to the sagas I think you need more evidence to support your line of thought.
Sorry for being off topic but evidence I sought out suggests that vikings and saxons did not wear kilts.
From several sources.
Viking Age Scotland saw a major influx of Scandinavian settlers and conquerors in Scotland and the surrounding islands. Settlers from Norway came to the Shetlands, the Orkneys, the Hebridies, the Isle of Man, the Western Islands, and parts of the Scottish mainland, attracted because the land and climate were similar to that back home in Scandinavia, with the added attraction of their proximity to the profitable Viking centers in Ireland and England. The Vikings lived next to and intermarried with the native Celtic populations. In large part the Norse settlements in this area comprised the Earldom of Orkney, while the Western Isles were ruled by Celto-Norse settlers.
Archaeology and other sources show, however, that the original settlement of the Vikings in parts of Scotland and the North Atlantic islands in many cases began earlier, and was a part of the often violent conquest and settlement of the Vikings outside of their Scandinavian homeland.
(BTW, for more on Vikings in Scotland, go to http://www.vikinganswerlady.com/scotland.htm Lots of great info there, including names, dates and locations).
That said, the Oxford English Dictionary states that the word kilt comes from Middle English, and is probably of Scandinavian origin, probably from the Danish word kilte, meaning 'to tuck up.' The term kilt is a Scots term (Scots is an English dialect), not the Gaelic term for the belted plaid. The Gaelic term for a kilt is breacan feile for the belted plaid, or feileadh beag for the modern kilt.
This is from kiltsnight.com
Webster's Dictionary (come on, it's not as if we can trust the Oxford Dictionary and the damn English with something as important as the definition of the word kilt) defines the kilt thusly - 1. Kilt, a knee-length pleated skirt usually of tartan worn by men in Scotland, chiefly of the Highlands and by Scottish Regiments in the British armies.
Definition of Kilt
Two additional items of interest, however, bare much closer scrutiny, these also from Webster's Dictionary. The first definition of Kilt is 1. Scandanavian in origin, from the verb 'kilten' - kjalta, fold of a gathered skirt. So kilt is used chiefly, 1. to tuck up (as a skirt) 2. to equip with a kilt ~ vi : to move nimbly. The second is Kilter: origin unknown - orderly arrangement; proper disposition; good condition: now always preceded by in or out of.
Now let's see if we can use what we just deducted from our research in a proper sentence, lads. - Imagine the coast of Scotland some time in the eighth century. A Viking from Norway came ashore off his longboat, (Scandinavian origin 'kjalta') 'kilted' (tucked up) his skirt in order to 'quickly' (to move nimbly) give the locals a good thrashing, made off with the women and other valuables and then everything was 'kilter' once again (orderly arrangement; proper disposition; good condition).
The Viking Skirt
The local lads in both Scotland and Ireland knew a good thing when they saw it. So they donned the Viking skirt and, not speaking much Old Norse, called it a kilt. But the Scots were so adept at this new fashion and all that went with it that the kilt has forever become associated in the eyes of the rest of the world with Scotland. Good on ya, lads. Scotland, forever! And we've been thrashing the English ever since, when not busy thrashing each other.
Lastly, if you are still not convinced, try browsing over to http://www.myclan.com/clanship/tartan/history.php
Lost of info there. All consistent with the above.
Happy reading.
-
-
5th September 05, 06:45 PM
#9
 Originally Posted by motorman4life
From several sources.
Viking Age Scotland
The Viking Skirt
The local lads in both Scotland and Ireland knew a good thing when they saw it. So they donned the Viking skirt and, not speaking much Old Norse, called it a kilt.
Lastly, if you are still not convinced, try browsing over to http://www.myclan.com/clanship/tartan/history.php
Lost of info there. All consistent with the above.
Happy reading.
Sorry to argue but none of my references have a viking skirt worn by men. They wore tunic and trousers, sometimes a cloak. The women wore pleated petticoats, if that's any help. Apparently, the viking brooch was copied from Irish/Scot designs.
Don't want to get caught up in yet another kilt origin thread but this concept doesn't work. Do you want me to post my references?
No point in romanticizing the vikings, they were not much more than travelling merchants with bad PR. Not a whole lot better, or worse, than anybody else at the time. No, wait, I'll go with a bit better: they had a structure in a time of chaos.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks