Quote Originally Posted by cajunscot
As someone who has been a reenactor (mostly American Civil War, Spanish-American War and other assorted periods), I have no problem with women in the ranks, as long as their is a lot of documentation for their presence. If there was a woman that served in a particular regiment disguised as a man, and it can be documented, then fine. Otherwise, it's an inaccurate portrayal of history.
To be fair, so are all of you being in fairly good health and having all your teeth, arms and legs or wearing wigs. I don't see a problem with a woman portraying a man on a stage or in a reenactment, or vice versa, that's just me.

BMackay- I was thinking of that, too!
which to attract the female of the species, and to discourage other males from invading his territory....
Hmmm... whenever I see a guy in kilts, he's at the bar talking to the women...