X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1
    An t-Ileach's Avatar
    An t-Ileach is offline Oops, it seems this member needs to update their email address
    Join Date
    28th June 05
    Location
    Preas a'Chiobair/Shepherd's Bush, Lunnainn/London RA/UK
    Posts
    468
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Banning of the Kilt in 1746

    In 7 months time, it will be the 260th Anniversary of the Act banning the kilt and all items of Highland Dress (the actual ban became effective a year later). Time enough to think about joining in whatever is going to be done (if anything) to commemorate this?



    ABOLITION AND PROSCRIPTION OF THE HIGHLAND DRESS

    19 GEORGE 11, CHAP. 39, SEC. 17, 1746

    'That from and after the first day of August, One thousand, seven hundred and forty-seven, no man or boy within that part of Great Britain called Scotland, other than such as shall be employed as Officers and Soldiers in His Majesty's Forces, shall, on any pretext whatever, wear or put on the clothes commonly called Highland clothes (that is to say) the Plaid, Philabeg, or little Kilt, Trouse, Shoulder-belts, or any part whatever of what peculiarly belongs to the Highland Garb; and that no tartan or partly-coloured plaid or stuff shall be used for Great Coats or upper coats, and if any such person shall presume after the said first day of August, to wear or put on the aforesaid garments or any part of them, every such person so offending......shall be liable to be transported to any of His Majesty's plantations beyond the seas, there to remain for the space of seven years'.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    2nd August 05
    Location
    Prescott, Arizona
    Posts
    1,069
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Count me in.

  3. #3
    macwilkin is offline
    Retired Forum Moderator
    Forum Historian

    Join Date
    22nd June 04
    Posts
    9,938
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Act of Proscription

    I plan on mentioning the anniversary of the Act in a seminar I'm giving at the Missouri Tartan Day Festivities in April '06 on district tartans.

    Cheers,

    Todd

  4. #4
    Join Date
    6th December 05
    Location
    by Loch Ness
    Posts
    296
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Angry

    Quite ironic that our new 'Scottish Parliament' is now talking about a sword and knife ban. I just hope that there's exemptions for Sgian Dubhs, Dirks and Claymores.

    Rab

  5. #5
    Join Date
    22nd January 04
    Location
    Southwestern Ontario
    Posts
    3,319
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Or alternatively, do something to commemorate the repeal. Even better, how about both!

    Quote Originally Posted by Rab Gordon
    Quite ironic that our new 'Scottish Parliament' is now talking about a sword and knife ban. I just hope that there's exemptions for Sgian Dubhs, Dirks and Claymores. Rab
    (slightly OT) Is this proposed to rectify a particular problem??


    blu

  6. #6
    Join Date
    6th December 05
    Location
    by Loch Ness
    Posts
    296
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Blu (Ontario)
    (slightly OT) Is this proposed to rectify a particular problem??
    blu
    Just the weegie neds chibbing each other.
    or to translate; There's a very high rate a stabbings in SW Central Scotland
    Usual story, the politicians want to be seen to be doing something and bannings seems a popular move - how little things have changed since the 18th century. At least they no longer classify the bagpipes as a weapon of war.

    Rab

  7. #7
    Join Date
    7th April 05
    Location
    Frederick, Maryland, USA
    Posts
    5,502
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by An t-Ileach
    In 7 months time, it will be the 260th Anniversary of the Act banning the kilt and all items of Highland Dress (the actual ban became effective a year later). Time enough to think about joining in whatever is going to be done (if anything) to commemorate this?
    Well, since I don't wear the kilt everyday, this past summer I wore my tartan kilt in a symbolic act of defiance. I also made sure that others knew the history of the day.
    We're fools whether we dance or not, so we might as well dance. - Japanese Proverb

  8. #8
    Join Date
    18th November 05
    Location
    Fairfax City, VA
    Posts
    1,617
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Blu (Ontario)
    (slightly OT) Is this proposed to rectify a particular problem??


    blu
    As a historian we have a habit of assuming that if a law is passed it is meant to address an existing problem in the society.

    However, looking at modern legislatures I often question that view. They seem to be more interested in crafting laws which appeal to an particular interest group or that allow them to grand-stand instead of actually facing the problems of the day.

    Although the assumption that laws reflect actual problems does make reading the Medieval Confessionals interesting. Those were books meant as manuals for priests trying to determine what penance to give for any given sin. Many of them have over 50% of their text covering sex with farm animals! It's funny to think that it really mattered how many goats were involved but somehow I think it had more to do with the filthy imagination of the monastic authors.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    3rd January 05
    Location
    Detoit, Michigan USA
    Posts
    3,767
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm in!
    [B]Paul Murray[/B]
    Kilted in Detroit! Now that's tough.... LOL

  10. #10
    Join Date
    15th August 05
    Location
    The urban village of Mt. Washington, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
    Posts
    482
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by GlassMan
    It's funny to think that it really mattered how many goats were involved but somehow I think it had more to do with the filthy imagination of the monastic authors.
    I'm sure the repressed imagination of the monastic authors had something to do with it, but those manuals were written during the height of Scholasticism, whereby everything was classified, stamped, and filed, so to speak.

    Everything, even sex with farm animals...and how many.


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0