-
29th December 05, 02:36 PM
#1
Banning of the Kilt in 1746
In 7 months time, it will be the 260th Anniversary of the Act banning the kilt and all items of Highland Dress (the actual ban became effective a year later). Time enough to think about joining in whatever is going to be done (if anything) to commemorate this?
ABOLITION AND PROSCRIPTION OF THE HIGHLAND DRESS
19 GEORGE 11, CHAP. 39, SEC. 17, 1746
'That from and after the first day of August, One thousand, seven hundred and forty-seven, no man or boy within that part of Great Britain called Scotland, other than such as shall be employed as Officers and Soldiers in His Majesty's Forces, shall, on any pretext whatever, wear or put on the clothes commonly called Highland clothes (that is to say) the Plaid, Philabeg, or little Kilt, Trouse, Shoulder-belts, or any part whatever of what peculiarly belongs to the Highland Garb; and that no tartan or partly-coloured plaid or stuff shall be used for Great Coats or upper coats, and if any such person shall presume after the said first day of August, to wear or put on the aforesaid garments or any part of them, every such person so offending......shall be liable to be transported to any of His Majesty's plantations beyond the seas, there to remain for the space of seven years'.
-
-
29th December 05, 07:58 PM
#2
-
-
29th December 05, 08:05 PM
#3
Act of Proscription
I plan on mentioning the anniversary of the Act in a seminar I'm giving at the Missouri Tartan Day Festivities in April '06 on district tartans.
Cheers,
Todd
-
-
30th December 05, 03:38 AM
#4
Quite ironic that our new 'Scottish Parliament' is now talking about a sword and knife ban. I just hope that there's exemptions for Sgian Dubhs, Dirks and Claymores.
Rab
-
-
30th December 05, 05:29 AM
#5
Or alternatively, do something to commemorate the repeal. Even better, how about both!
Originally Posted by Rab Gordon
Quite ironic that our new 'Scottish Parliament' is now talking about a sword and knife ban. I just hope that there's exemptions for Sgian Dubhs, Dirks and Claymores. Rab
(slightly OT) Is this proposed to rectify a particular problem??
blu
-
-
30th December 05, 05:53 AM
#6
Originally Posted by Blu (Ontario)
(slightly OT) Is this proposed to rectify a particular problem??
blu
Just the weegie neds chibbing each other.
or to translate; There's a very high rate a stabbings in SW Central Scotland
Usual story, the politicians want to be seen to be doing something and bannings seems a popular move - how little things have changed since the 18th century. At least they no longer classify the bagpipes as a weapon of war.
Rab
-
-
30th December 05, 06:31 AM
#7
Originally Posted by An t-Ileach
In 7 months time, it will be the 260th Anniversary of the Act banning the kilt and all items of Highland Dress (the actual ban became effective a year later). Time enough to think about joining in whatever is going to be done (if anything) to commemorate this?
Well, since I don't wear the kilt everyday, this past summer I wore my tartan kilt in a symbolic act of defiance. I also made sure that others knew the history of the day.
We're fools whether we dance or not, so we might as well dance. - Japanese Proverb
-
-
30th December 05, 08:48 AM
#8
Originally Posted by Blu (Ontario)
(slightly OT) Is this proposed to rectify a particular problem??
blu
As a historian we have a habit of assuming that if a law is passed it is meant to address an existing problem in the society.
However, looking at modern legislatures I often question that view. They seem to be more interested in crafting laws which appeal to an particular interest group or that allow them to grand-stand instead of actually facing the problems of the day.
Although the assumption that laws reflect actual problems does make reading the Medieval Confessionals interesting. Those were books meant as manuals for priests trying to determine what penance to give for any given sin. Many of them have over 50% of their text covering sex with farm animals! It's funny to think that it really mattered how many goats were involved but somehow I think it had more to do with the filthy imagination of the monastic authors.
-
-
30th December 05, 09:52 AM
#9
[B]Paul Murray[/B]
Kilted in Detroit! Now that's tough.... LOL
-
-
30th December 05, 10:00 AM
#10
Originally Posted by GlassMan
It's funny to think that it really mattered how many goats were involved but somehow I think it had more to do with the filthy imagination of the monastic authors.
I'm sure the repressed imagination of the monastic authors had something to do with it, but those manuals were written during the height of Scholasticism, whereby everything was classified, stamped, and filed, so to speak.
Everything, even sex with farm animals...and how many.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks