-
2nd January 06, 07:39 PM
#1
Come on guys...be honest. Tell me how you really feel.
Obviously hair sporrans don't have a very high rating here, at least for civilian wear. Where did they go wrong? From the period illustrations I've seen they were a popular type of sporran for civilian wear. Maybe not for the working class, but at least for the well-to-do, gentlemen sorts. Our own Matt Newsome has a picture of himself, on his website, wearing one. If anyone can elaborate on them and their history, please do. I would appriciate it.
-
-
2nd January 06, 08:34 PM
#2
I have nothing against them. They do look nice and all. However on a personal note, I do not see myself wearing one, because I am not a piper or in a military unit.
Glen McGuire
A Life Lived in Fear, Is a Life Half Lived.
-
-
2nd January 06, 10:23 PM
#3
 Originally Posted by HeathBar
Obviously hair sporrans don't have a very high rating here, at least for civilian wear. Where did they go wrong? From the period illustrations I've seen they were a popular type of sporran for civilian wear.
One should be careful using the MacIan prints or other period Victorian illustrations of highland dress as models for what's proper. Those drawings are fanciful at best and while I don't doubt that the occasional highland gentleman strapped on broadsword, dirk, pistols, powder horn, plaid and yes, hair sporran for a formal event...consider that none of of those other acoutrements have survived in any commonly used form to today.
Just my 0.02.
-
-
3rd January 06, 12:23 AM
#4
Owl of Oban is quite right, people would dress up in the imagined attire of the
'wild untamed highlander', and so be pictured.
When in fact they'd probably wear trews or even the normal attire of the English upper classes: of which they saw themselves as a part.
The point being that the kilt is practical wear-imagine wearing a fancy hairy sporran on the hill all day, and in all weathers?
To get the point, look at the miltary portraits of the second part of the 19thC-all the finery: and then look at actual photographs of the time.
James
-
-
3rd January 06, 05:32 AM
#5
I have a b/w photo of my Great Grandfather standing outside of his croft in his kilt, jacket and vest with watch chain and fob, and is wearing a long horse hair sporran with what appears to be black hose and black lace up shoes. The photo dates around 1880. He is not in his "Formal Wear", nor was he a piper. However he did serve in the Black Watch, so this may be his sporran from his time in the service.
I do not have a scanner, however I am going get this photo, and several others that I have, and have then scanned in the near future.
Brian
"I find that a great part of the information I have was acquired by looking up something and finding something else on the way."
- Franklin P. Adams
-
-
3rd January 06, 06:14 AM
#6
I'll vote for the "no go" side but for a different reason. If you're looking for a sporran for "everyday wear", you probably want one with lots of room.
Horsehair sporrans have VERY limited (if ANY AT ALL) pocket space to put your "stuff". We have 1 for sale in the shop and it has a VERY small pocket on the back... enough for your credit cards and money and MAYBE a couple keys. Many Horsehair sporrans don't have any pockets and you're left making your friends carry your stuff.
I can hear it now... "Can you hold my money at the bar... I don't have any pockets". "SURE!"
-
-
3rd January 06, 07:31 AM
#7
I come from a military family with grandparents in the Gordon Highlanders and an Uncle who served in the Black Watch, there is a very old photo of the Gordon Highlanders with my GG Grandfather on it and they all have horsehair sporrans Ill try and find a link
-
-
3rd January 06, 07:35 AM
#8

hes bottom left behind the machine gun
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks