X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 74
  1. #11
    Join Date
    18th February 05
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Posts
    3,363
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Does it matter?

    I don't think it matters how long the kilt is. A few weeks ago I was at the celebration of Greek Independence day and saw a number of pictures of Greek heros in long skirts!
    Men have worn skirts of various lengths for a very long time.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    18th November 05
    Location
    Fairfax City, VA
    Posts
    1,617
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The dimensions of kilts were changed from the high rise of the traditional kilt to the low rise of the contemporary hip-huggers yet here we still call the contemporary products such as Utilikilts kilts. But if you place the two kilts one a flat surface with waistband to waistband the utilikilt would look incredibly short. From my perspective the modern kilts seem to expose too much torso for my tastes, but that doesn't stop me from calling them kilts because of the basic construction (double apron front and pleated back).

    It seems to me like the TFCK models mentioned here have simply modified the length from a different dimension. Instead of bring the waistband down, they took the hem or selvedge line down. I would definitely not call the result pleasing to the eye, or something that I would wear. I also would never consider it a traditional kilt or an American contemporary Kilt, but it still does have the basic construction of double aprons and pleated back. So to me it just seems like yet another variant (albeit a rather unsightly variant) of the kilt.

    It's not something I would ever consider wearing, but because of the construction I don't think it qualifies as a skirt. If we are going to disqualify it from consideration because of its difference in length from a traditional kilt, then by the same token we should disqualify the use of kilt to describe such things as Utilikilts & NeoKilts. Since there seems to be general agreement that the modern contemporary kilts are still kilts despite their deviations from traditional standards, I would submit that we should view these ankle-length monstrosities as a curious variation that is still a kilt but hopefully a version that won't survive the test of the market.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    23rd March 06
    Location
    Kingston, Canada
    Posts
    388
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by GlassMan
    It's not something I would ever consider wearing, but because of the construction I don't think it qualifies as a skirt. If we are going to disqualify it from consideration because of its difference in length from a traditional kilt, then by the same token we should disqualify the use of kilt to describe such things as Utilikilts & NeoKilts. Since there seems to be general agreement that the modern contemporary kilts are still kilts despite their deviations from traditional standards, I would submit that we should view these ankle-length monstrosities as a curious variation that is still a kilt but hopefully a version that won't survive the test of the market.
    My thoughts exactly.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    23rd March 05
    Location
    Vancouver B.C.
    Posts
    1,015
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Kiltman
    I don't think it matters how long the kilt is. A few weeks ago I was at the celebration of Greek Independence day and saw a number of pictures of Greek heros in long skirts!
    Men have worn skirts of various lengths for a very long time.
    Very true. As long as they aren't wearing "pants" , then it's all good.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    23rd January 04
    Posts
    4,682
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Kiltman
    I don't think it matters how long the kilt is. A few weeks ago I was at the celebration of Greek Independence day and saw a number of pictures of Greek heros in long skirts!
    Men have worn skirts of various lengths for a very long time.
    In my personal opinion, they may be worn by men, but they are not kilts. All kilts are skirts, but not all skirts are kilts. Let's keep the discussions to kilts and leave the skirt talk for the other forums where that is the subject matter at hand.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    28th March 04
    Location
    My classrooms
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I like the look of them myself, would be great for clubbing

    Rob

  7. #17
    Join Date
    9th January 06
    Location
    Los Angeles, California
    Posts
    567
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by GlassMan
    ...It's not something I would ever consider wearing, but because of the construction I don't think it qualifies as a skirt. If we are going to disqualify it from consideration because of its difference in length from a traditional kilt, then by the same token we should disqualify the use of kilt to describe such things as Utilikilts & NeoKilts. Since there seems to be general agreement that the modern contemporary kilts are still kilts despite their deviations from traditional standards, I would submit that we should view these ankle-length monstrosities as a curious variation that is still a kilt but hopefully a version that won't survive the test of the market.
    You're absolutely right again sir. These bring back to mind the "Man Bag" of the early 1970's which were no more than scaled up versions of womens purses. They were popular with the gay set for a while and then even they stopped using them, perhaps because they were heavier than womens purses, I dunno...

    Chris.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    10th August 04
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    1,172
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You're absolutely right again sir. These bring back to mind the "Man Bag" of the early 1970's which were no more than scaled up versions of womens purses. They were popular with the gay set for a while and then even they stopped using them, perhaps because they were heavier than womens purses, I dunno...
    I think it's because us guys like having both hands free -- for eating and drinking beer with one hand while fending off retched foes with the other.

    I'm beginning to think that rules about kilts are like rules about love. The rule only applies to the person who made it.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    21st December 05
    Location
    Hawick, Scotland
    Posts
    11,092
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There is a perception in some quarters that men's kilts shouldn't fall below the knee. There were some great pics on British TV recently of Prince Charles and Princess Camilla walking about on their recent overseas tour in matching Balmoral kilts, his knee length and hers calf length and they both looked right for the people wearing them. Earlier this year I bought a couple of self colour lightweight polyester kilts on e-bay which hang to just below the knee on me and I feel that these really do need to be accessorised with a sporran as without it they do look rather similar to the old fashioned skirts which schoolgirls used to wear before they all converted to trousers. Call them skirts if you want, but they do have the correct front overlap, some pleats at the back and the fringe on the wearer's right so I don't think the seller is breaking the Trades Description Acts by calling them men's kilts.
    Regional Director for Scotland for Clan Cunningham International, and a Scottish Armiger.

  10. #20
    Kilted KT is offline Membership Revoked for repeated rule violations.
    Join Date
    4th March 06
    Location
    A long time ago in a kilt far, far away
    Posts
    3,129
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    These garments sounds like kilted skirts, not actual kilts. I've heard of many different types of kilted garments that would surely not qualify as kilt in anyone's eyes.

Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0