|
-
 Originally Posted by James
True they lived in bloodthirsty times, and there is evidence of human and animal sacrifice. However there is also ample evidence that both the Picts and the Celts were sophisticated races, and not mere savages.
So true. Just because a culture does barbaric things does not make them barbarians. For instance, the Mayans did some awful things, but had an incredibly sophisticated culture.
We're fools whether we dance or not, so we might as well dance. - Japanese Proverb
-
-
Most of what's known about the Celts and Picts is from Roman writings since neither had a written language, only an oral tradition relying on bards and Druids to pass on knowledge and information. Given the Romans tried conquering them whenever they met it's little wonder they were described as warlike and savage.
-
-
I seem to remember that this series touched on the Pre-Roman times in Ireland:
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/ancientireland/index.html
...an excellent series...I think that they touched on the Picts...anyway, the evidence is that the early cultures were actually pretty advanced...certainly not running around naked.
Best
AA
-
-
Here's an another take on the subject I've read. I don't know enough about it to draw my own conlusions yet, but it may add something to the mix.
The Picts never existed.
This theory is based partly on the lack of extant artifacts, and also on those self-same Roman writings. According to the No Picts theory, they were the same as the other Celts in Britain, and the Romans needed a boogeyman away up north. They were a percieved threat, not a real one.
I thought it was interesting. Partly because it flies directly in the face of "common knowledge," and partly as an example of how little we really know about that time and place.
As to whether or not it's true, that's a much trickier problem. I certainly don't know. I'll have to do a lot more research, and I'm really more interested in the 14th century anyway, at which time it's a moot point anyway
An uair a théid an gobhainn air bhathal 'se is feàrr a bhi réidh ris.
(When the smith gets wildly excited, 'tis best to agree with him.)
Kiltio Ergo Sum.
I Kilt, therefore I am. -McClef
-
-
Oooooh! The Picts never existed? I like that one...maybe the Celts encountered the Romans and figured they'd pull a fast one and told them, "Oh, well...we're tough and you can try to beat us but you haven't run up against the Picts yet...they live further up North and they regularly kick our asses....yessir...we sure don't fancy your chances against those Picts."
Then they ran off (laughing) and waited until nighttime, got naked, smeared blue paint all over themselves and snuck up on the Romans...."Oy, ya Roman Bastards, we're the Picts...we're much tougher than those Celts and we're here to beat the snot outta ya!" (Sounds of Romans freaking out and wetting their togas)
Early psychological warfare...sneaky...I like it.
Best
AA
-
-
It's difficult to follow the "Picts never existed" line.
I'd heard (from the "Picts existed" school) that some of them may have migrated to the north of Ireland where they were known as the Cruidhne (which some say is a Q Celtic cognate of Picti, but it doesn't quite fit - there're consonants in wrong places) who merge with the Scotti (or some of them) and migrated back to the Earra Gaidheal (Gael Coast, or Argyll) as the Sons of Erc (i.e.Dal Riada).
There's a claim that they might have spoken a P Celtic language like that spoken by the Brythons of Strathclyde, based on place names and some proper names (although they seem to have had the initial combination "Uu..." where the Strathclyde "Welsh" had Gw (modern Welsh orthography)).
There's also a story that they had an origin myth that they came to the east of Scotland from across the North Sea - which places them in the southern Norway-Jutland area - which is where Strabo/Ptolemy/Diodorus Siculus placed the "Cimbri". I think I read all this in Kenneth Bannerman's monograph on Dal Riada, but on reflection it's likely that it may have been from various places.
-
-
I'm just trying to figure out why the Picts would be mentioned at all in a documentary about Kinf Henry VIII (1491-1547).
Henry VIII is closer to our own time than he is to the time of the Picts.
M
-
-
 Originally Posted by auld argonian
Then they ran off (laughing) and waited until nighttime, got naked, smeared blue paint all over themselves and snuck up on the Romans...."Oy, ya Roman Bastards, we're the Picts...we're much tougher than those Celts and we're here to beat the snot outta ya!" (Sounds of Romans freaking out and wetting their togas)
Early psychological warfare...sneaky...I like it.
Best
AA
AA, the bill for a new monitor is in the mail.
Cheers,
Nick
An uair a théid an gobhainn air bhathal 'se is feàrr a bhi réidh ris.
(When the smith gets wildly excited, 'tis best to agree with him.)
Kiltio Ergo Sum.
I Kilt, therefore I am. -McClef
-
-
 Originally Posted by auld argonian
Oooooh! The Picts never existed? I like that one...maybe the Celts encountered the Romans and figured they'd pull a fast one and told them, "Oh, well...we're tough and you can try to beat us but you haven't run up against the Picts yet...they live further up North and they regularly kick our asses....yessir...we sure don't fancy your chances against those Picts."
Then they ran off (laughing) and waited until nighttime, got naked, smeared blue paint all over themselves and snuck up on the Romans...."Oy, ya Roman Bastards, we're the Picts...we're much tougher than those Celts and we're here to beat the snot outta ya!" (Sounds of Romans freaking out and wetting their togas)
Early psychological warfare...sneaky...I like it.
Best
AA
That is hilarious!!!
We're fools whether we dance or not, so we might as well dance. - Japanese Proverb
-
-
1st June 06, 03:30 PM
#10
This is a huge simplification, but I believe most current scholarship contends thet the Picts of what we now call "Scotland" were P-Celtic speaking Celts not much different than their Brittonish cousins to the south. Further, it is believed that the P-Celtic Britons and Picts easily associated with the Q-Celtic Gaels in Ireland, that there was much interaction back and forth, and that the different variations in language were not much of a barrier. (Our modern concept of these all being separate "countries" would not have been shared by these folks, who probably identified with "tribes", not nationalities.)
When Gaels from Ireland established an expanding presence in Scotland, their closeness to, and ability to easily interact with the native Picts, resulted in a "merging" of the two peoples... with Northmen, Strathclyde Britons, Anglo-Saxons, Normans, Flemish, etc., added to the mix to give us what were ultimately called "Scotsmen"...!
Brian
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." ~ Benjamin Franklin
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks