X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
7th June 06, 12:14 PM
#10
 Originally Posted by Caradoc
Just by eyeballing it, it looks like the kilt was sized for "waist," and the person wearing it is "low-riding" it across the hips.
If he'd wear it at the waist, it'd probably look a lot better.
I think that was likely measured to be that long, and even if you wore it under the armpits, it would still be too ill fitting to be a considered a kilt.
-
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks