4.5 inch sett isn't big enough, so I want your opinion

[Scottish Chi]

I think you should make it with a 38/40 inch waist so if you don't like it you can send it to me!

I like the material and the way you have figured the pleating. I don't know how to make a kilt but the visual of the pleated pattern looks good to me. I would be happy to send you more material if you would like to make another for me for more practice.

Cheers! Bill

[cavscout]

I've been watching that material also for a while. Without the red stripe it looks a bit boring. I wouldn't let it keep me from making a knock around kilt but as far as a kilt to step out in probably not.

Can you go with a couple less pleats to give deeper pleats and use whatever's left to give you deeper reverse pleats at the aprons?

[Schultz]

Have you thought of trying your hand at a box-pleat, Alan?

[KiltedCodeWarrior]

Looks good to me Alan. But Schultz does bring up a good possibility by making a box pleated. Yuo could make fewer, but deeper pleats, to sett or stripe, and not need any more cloth (I think).

[Alan H]

Yes, I could box-pleat this, which is a thought. It'd have more box-pleats than one of Matt's kilts, more like about 12-14 pleats, but yeah, that would work just fine. Hmmm. I might have enough left over for a vest, too.....like I've got time to make a tartan vest?

Cavscout, actually to get deeper pleats and only pleat one sett, I'd have to make a smaller reveal. I could do that, but I'm thinking that I'd need more material because the number of pleats would go up. Also, I don't know that I want to hand-sew 35+ pleats into a kilt that I'm not "involved with" you know? If this were the X Marks tartan or the California tartan or MacNaughton, I'd do it....but it's not..

Just a note on sett size and pleat depth for anybody who's reading..... If you think about it, you can't just "make deeper pleats" when you're pleating a kilt to a pattern (the sett). The pattern, combined with the amount of "reveal" you want defines the depth of the pleat. Since the revealed part of the pleat is usually between 3/4 and 1.5 inches, making a 1/4 inch change in "reveal" won't significantly affect the depth of the pleats. It will, however, significantly change the number of pleats you have to sew! You can pleat double setts, which works fine, but that does go through tartan rather quickly. If you take a 4.5 inch sett and fold it in half, (which is analogous to having NO revealed part of the pleat at all) you'd only have pleats that are 2.25 inches deep. That's just barely acceptable, in my mind, and obviously you can't have NO revealed section of the pleat, right?

Barb says in her book that pleats less than 1/2 inch don't look good, and I'd agree with that. OK, so If I use a 1/2 inch reveal, then that means my pleat depth will be half of what's left of the sett.

4.5 inches minus 0.5 inch = 4 inches.

Divide that 4 inches in half and you get two-inch deep pleats. That's OK for a tartan skirt, but it kind of doesn't cut it, in my mind, for a kilt. Now, this is just "ME", you know? My 5-yard Holyrood has pleats which are 2.25 inches deep. That looks fine to me, but I don't think that 2 inch deep pleats is gonna work very well.

There's something else to think on, and that's the amount of work I want to go through. My hip (read: butt) measurement is 48 inches. OK divide that in half, because of course half of the kilt is in the aprons and half is in pleats, right? OK, so that's 24. If I'm going to cover that 24 inches 'round me rump with half-inch wide pleats, that means I'm hand-sewing FORTY EIGHT PLEATS!!!!!!!!!

Forget it!! No way am I hand-sewing 48 pleats. If I use one-inch wide reveals, then that 24 inches is covered by 24 pleats, which is just dandy. If I cover that 24 inches with 3/4 inch wide pleats, then I'd have 32 pleats, which his the very upper end of what I'd ever consider hand-sewing. But the one-inch reveals give me a pleat depth like this...

4.5 inches (sett size) - 1 inch (the reveal) = 3.5 inches
Divide that 3.5 inches in half to get pleat depth and you get 1.75 inches. YUCK. That's nowhere near deep enough to make a decent-looking kilt.

Note that a tartan with a 6-inch sett (the X Marks tartan is about 6 inches, a bit more) If you use a one-inch reveal, will have 2.5 inch deep pleats, which looks good.. If you use a 3/4 inch reveal it will have 2.64 inch ( or 2 and 5/8ths inches) deep reveal, which is starting to look pretty nice, to my eye.

[starbkjrus]

Lordy those numbers made me dizzy.

I do like your proposed pleat to set and a half though.

[MacWage]

My "Jedi" kilt (See Greenville game pics) has a total pivot-to-pivot sett of about 4.5 inches. I did a 1.5 sett- 6 3/4 inches per pleat. For box pleats the outside face of the pleat is 1/3 of the total pleat with an ideal range of 2-3 inches (confirmed with Matt). Thus the 1.5 sett would give a 6 3/4 pleat with a 2 1/4 inch facing. This would look good, feel good, and be rather practical.

Now, I'm thinking of this material (dang it!) of myself.

A box pleat would work quite well and not be a HUGE amount of work. Now, back to working on my current project-> a box-pleat in "Green Stewart" sans the blue stripes-> I go it cheap, its wool, its practice, and the colors match my car (a Miata painted in Lotus Racing Green, Lotus Racing Yellow stripe, and red leather seats and door covers over black carpet (based on the Team Lotus racing cars).

[Alan H]

Have you thought of trying your hand at a box-pleat, Alan?

Huh....I'm liking this idea......

[Angus]

Huh....I'm liking this idea......

Hey Alan, go for it

[CameronTaylor]

Thumbs up to the second, but that's cuz I like stripes.
I'm glad Steve is doing my X Marks (if I ever escape from the nether world of his computer's files ...)


CT - echo ? echo ? :confused: