-
22nd June 06, 09:25 PM
#21
Originally Posted by MacWage
For those who misses it, Chris was asking for a disposable kilt to wear at work, a literal dump. He told of wearing out red wings and other high quality, durable boots, and jeans in a matter of weeks to months. Yet, he was looking for kilts to wear that could be worn, washed, and reworn at least 10 times. As for the widsom of kilts in such an environment, I leave that to him.
As many, my first reaction was "YOU WANT TO DO WHAT?" Yet, I left that to him and was trying to offer a REAL suggestion, which might actually be helpful.
Now, lets keep this thread on KILTS (not women's lacross skirts)!
I think bare legs in a dump is a spectacularly bad idea.
-
-
22nd June 06, 09:28 PM
#22
Originally Posted by MacWage
For those who misses it, Chris was asking for a disposable kilt to wear at work, a literal dump. He told of wearing out red wings and other high quality, durable boots, and jeans in a matter of weeks to months. Yet, he was looking for kilts to wear that could be worn, washed, and reworn at least 10 times. As for the widsom of kilts in such an environment, I leave that to him.
As many, my first reaction was "YOU WANT TO DO WHAT?" Yet, I left that to him and was trying to offer a REAL suggestion, which might actually be helpful.
Now, lets keep this thread on KILTS (not women's lacross skirts)!
Aren't HAZMAT suits the garb of choice in such an environment? While I abhore the thought of requiring pants at work, this is one of the few jobs that walking around regimental in a kilt just does not make sense. I don't care how cheap or durable a kilt is, runing around a dump without leg coverings is pure craziness...
-
-
22nd June 06, 09:35 PM
#23
Cheap and Durable? You must be kidding me. I don't think there is anything that is cheap and durable. It is like an oxymoron. You get what you pay for. Most cheap stuff are poorly made.
Once agian, Kilts are not cheap because of the material required and they are labour intensive.
-
-
22nd June 06, 09:40 PM
#24
Originally Posted by Kilted KT
Aren't HAZMAT suits the garb of choice in such an environment? While I abhore the thought of requiring pants at work, this is one of the few jobs that walking around regimental in a kilt just does not make sense. I don't care how cheap or durable a kilt is, runing around a dump without leg coverings is pure craziness...
I hope that he doesn't go regitmental when wearin his kilt to the dump......that would be crazy.
-
-
23rd June 06, 04:15 AM
#25
Originally Posted by Raphael
Cheap and Durable? You must be kidding me. I don't think there is anything that is cheap and durable. It is like an oxymoron. You get what you pay for. Most cheap stuff are poorly made.
Once agian, Kilts are not cheap because of the material required and they are labour intensive.
No, I don't go regimental on the job ... like Raphael said, that would be crazy. As for it being crazy to run around construction sites and dumps bare legged, well, tell that to the Scottish soldiers who ran around battlefields dressed is a similar way.
Most guys here in Texas wear shorts on the job and, yes, we all get our legs scratched up sometimes. Still, dinged up legs is better than heatstroke, I think. The multi layer apron on a SportKilt does provide some real protection, though ... I've yet to be injured above the hem of my kilt.
Raphael is right, cheap and durable may well be an oxymoror, but $40 to 50$ really is not very cheap for something you know will likely be destroyed. Construction guys like me buy our shirts and socks from Walmart for about $3.50 and occassionially throw them out after just one wearing ... given that white is the most heat reflective it is also the most popular color, though the least durable.
Kilts truly are very practical to wear. I first started wearing kilts on the job after seeing a picture of a WWI Scottish soldier leaping into a trench in his kilt. Further research revealed that even the kilted soldiers in the American Revolution faired better health wise than the trousered soldiers. (Yes, there were kilted citizen soldiers back then.)
There is no perfect uniform for the demands of my particular profession, but kilts actually do provide the most protection for the most sensitive areas while keeping you relatively dry and comfortable at the same time. No matter what you wear on the job the best route to safety is common sense and carefulness.
I do appreciate the concerns some of you have mentioned, but I've been healthier and happier since switching to kilts. It's 0610 hrs now so I'm off to get my equipment and head on out.
Kilt On.
Chris Webb
-
-
23rd June 06, 12:09 PM
#26
Originally Posted by Robinhood
I had another thought. How about cordouroy.
I don't know if it is made the same as it was
when I was a kid, because it seemed like a
plowed field then, compared to what I see in
stores now, but the cords I had back then
seemed to never wear out.
I doubt you could make one from a full
8 yards due to thickness, but a 4 yard
one should be possible.
I thought Union Kilt (look up at the top of this page) also made cordouroy kilts.
-
-
23rd June 06, 01:33 PM
#27
I think leather would be the way to go for durablity but expense wise it wouldn't be cheap. I agree with Raphael you get what you pay for I really like wearing my denim kilt and my canvas kilts they are very durable and not as expensive as leather if you check my website there is a pic of me in my 8yrd army green kilt and como of the camo kilt in action I'll be wearing my denim this weekend helping a friend move.
MacHummel
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks