X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 28

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    28th January 04
    Location
    Finger Lakes, New York
    Posts
    361
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bubba
    You mean it'll become party attire at fraternity houses?
    Well, substitute the word "attire" with "costume," and you're correct. Compound that with the fact that fraternities hardly ever HAVE toga parties -- and if they do, it's an homage to the movie Animal House instead of Greek culture -- and you see the dilemma.

    Leave kilts as an unalterable cultural artifact, and they will die. People will know what they are, but they'll hardly ever wear them.

    The Utilikilt is necessary, as are other modern variations. They make kilt-wearing practical and open. Anyone in the world can wear them, whenever they please. If they keep kilt-wearing vital, they will make the Scottish national dress a living thing.

  2. #2
    macwilkin is offline
    Retired Forum Moderator
    Forum Historian

    Join Date
    22nd June 04
    Posts
    9,938
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ???

    Quote Originally Posted by Ugly Bear
    Leave kilts as an unalterable cultural artifact, and they will die. People will know what they are, but they'll hardly ever wear them.

    The Utilikilt is necessary, as are other modern variations. They make kilt-wearing practical and open. Anyone in the world can wear them, whenever they please. If they keep kilt-wearing vital, they will make the Scottish national dress a living thing.
    As one who wears his kilt as a "unalterable cultural artifact", I respectfully disagree with this statement. The traditional kilt has been around for a quite a while, and for those of us who see it as a "cultural/heritage" symbol, it will always been a garment with significance and meaning to be honoured. And why must wearing a kilt on a regular basis be the only mark of a "real kilt wearer"?

    And as far as Utilikilts go, It has always been my understanding that the owners of UK never based the garment on a traditional Scottish kilt anyway -- so the claim that they will somehow save kilts from extinction seems to be a moot point, since they are "not related". I would argue that Rocky or Steve kilts are more appropriate for that claim, since they are modern versions of a traditional kilt.

    No UK-bashing here, though -- to each his own. It's not my thing, but for others, it is, and that's great in my book.

    Regards,

    Todd

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0