Considering a Feilidh-beag

**Andrew Green** · 18th August 06, 09:10 AM

Thanks for the links. I already shot Matt an email... he was the second person I contacted, right after the Celtic Croft. Yes, it is more or less the bottom part of the great kilt, but CC has the option of getting pleats "cheatered" in. I may go with that option, I do not know yet.
In hte way of tartans, I am looking for something that would be historically viable in the stock homespun stuff at the CC. So I guess that breaks it down to analyzing the colours.

**davedove** · 18th August 06, 10:00 AM

I'm not sure what you're looking for in "viable" colors. All of the different colors existed, even the bright ones. Now, some colors were more expensive than others and thus not as common. Also, they probably faded quicker, both because they didn't have modern setting techniques and they were exposed to the elements more.

**Andrew Green** · 18th August 06, 10:31 AM

Davedove:
by viable colours, I mean colours that might have been plausible around the time of the '45. If all those colours existed at the time, well, then I have a bit of a debate then don't I? I am leaning towards either Hunting Stewart, Ulster Red, or Brown Watch.... and perhaps the Buchanan Muted. They all look good, and all but the Ulster have solid earth tones in them. But I have read on Matt's site that the Ulster is a pretty old pattern...so that is a definite contender.

**davedove** · 18th August 06, 10:34 AM

What it sounds like you're looking for is historically valid tartans. Most tartans came into being in the last couple hundred years. Matt should be able to give you good advice on that, as well as a few others here on the forum. Good luck!

**Andrew Green** · 18th August 06, 10:57 AM

Davedove:
Historically valid would be a good way to put it. I am aware that many of the setts listed on the Celtic Croft's homespun list might not have been that old, but if the colours used are viable, then that is a decent starting point, no?
I have read much on the background of tartans, and their naming/association...and it is indeed a much more modern concept when compared to the relative age of tartans in general. Needless to say, Matt's site, and the tartan museum have been incredibly helpful (not to mention my constant picking of Matt's brain... what can I say the guy know's his stuff). If I am going for an older style garment, it only seems natural to get a tartan that is viable for that time period (Gordon Red Muted for my first belted plaid...should actually be arriving today... and the Gordon Red looks very similar to the Huntly district tartan... which is believed to be a fairly old sett...and the Gordon Red itself is fairly old, and believed to be older than the documentation)... I could prattle on and on over this...what can I say, I am just as interested in the history(both of the garment, and the country) as I am the garment itself. I figure it's the least I could do to show some respect. Needless to say, I am always learning... but then again, that is also one of the best aspects.

**Planopiper** · 18th August 06, 11:22 AM

You keep saying "viable". I don't think that's the word you mean. You want colors that are legitimate for the period you want to mimic. Historically accurate. Valid in their context. Suitable. Genuine. Authentic. True.

**Andrew Green** · 18th August 06, 11:32 AM

But would a tartan that was created in "authentic colours", yet not containing a sett that has been proven to have existed at that time not be a "viable" scheme?

Viable,definition #3:
Capable of success or continuing effectiveness; practicable: a viable plan; a viable national economy. See Synonyms at possible.

See where my though process is going on this one? If the sett has not been proven to exist in the early 1700s, yet the colour style has been, then would it not be historically possible?

Well, that's my defense for it anyhow. Valid in their context is another way to put it, yes.

**Woodsheal** · 18th August 06, 11:36 AM

Andrew,
Your color choice would very much depend on what "class" of clansman you're portraying for the `45 period. Look at period portraiture of clan chiefs, chieftains, and other upper-crust guys. They invariably are wearing bright red tartans of various setts, as bright as any "modern" red tartan. Why? The dye to achieve that bright red was imported and expensive, thus such a tartan is a status symbol.
If you are portraying a common clansman, then the earthier-toned shades as achieved from local dyestuffs are the appropriate choice.

Check out my website below, and the article on 1745 impressions....