X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Join Date
    21st June 06
    Location
    San Francisco, California or there abouts
    Posts
    2,071
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    LA Dressed to Kilt

    From LA Weekly


    Fashion Flashing

    Written by LINA LECARO

    Fashion Week got off to a randy start at Saturday’s Dressed to Kilt charity event and fashion show, filling Smashbox’s main tent with hordes of Catholic-schoolgirl wannabes (even though the suggested attire on the invite said Scottish and plaid, not sluttish and Britney Spears), along with traditional-skirt-wearing fellas, most of whom were of the over-50 variety but still had great legs.

    Is all this gam action on men a turn-on or turnoff? I found myself pondering the question as knobby knee after knobby knee squeezed past me in the crowd before the big show, and I finally decided that it is kinda sexy. And let’s not forget that the proper way for a gentleman to wear his kilt is free and flowing, i.e., sans underwear.

    Short of taking a poll to see who was actually adhering to “Scottish regimental dress” (the term for letting the jewels hang), I decided to chat with a member of the Los Angeles Scots Pipe Band (all young chaps), which opened up the runway show with a parade of spirited Scottish rhythms.

    Redheaded drummer boy Scott MacDonald (how’s that for a traditional Scottish name?) told me that, yes, everyone in the band was boxerless and briefless, and, yes, everybody asks them about it every time they perform somewhere. He didn’t seem to mind, though.

    “It’s great,” he said. “It feels really comfortable.” He had this twinkle in his eye as he spoke, and for a moment I thought he actually might try to prove his claim. Though I was curious, I quickly cut the convo short. No fire-crotch flashin’ for me, thanks, mate.

    When the runway show began, I soon realized that the undie-less aspect was a huge part of the event. With a panel of mostly female judges and a few celebs (Patricia Arquette, Paul Rodriguez) holding up numbers for the best models, the show quickly took on a Chippendales vibe, with ladies running onto the catwalk and stuffing dollar bills into the waistbands of kilt-wearing prancers such as Chris Kattan (who walked to Rod Stewart’s “Hot Legs”), Rex Lee (Ari Gold’s hilarious gay Asian assistant on Entourage) and some decidedly hunkier actors who looked familiar but whose names escaped me.

    Nearly every dude up there teasingly pretended to lift his kilt at some point, but from my vantage I only saw one real bare bottom (that of actor Hamish Linklater from the Julia Louis-Dreyfus comedy The New Adventures of Old Christine), and that was okay by me.

    Other models included Linda Hamilton done up like a queen, Kimberly and Alana Stewart in the aforementioned Spears-ish plaid minis and Crossing Jordan’s Steve Valentine, who threw miniature Johnny Walker bottles out to the crowd. (JW sponsored the gathering.)

    As for the fashion itself, there were some beautiful pieces: gowns beaded in sparkling plaid patterns, colorful capes and matching wool kilts, cozy-looking sweaters and a way-too-short segment celebrating the work of Vivienne Westwood, which showed some of her foxiest and fanciest tartan, including deconstructed skirts, dresses and bondage pants that meshed elegance and anarchy in a way that no one else can.

    For all the flaunting and shirtless skirted studs who killed it in kilts, it was the Westwood pieces that ultimately raised the temperature in the room. Yup, when it comes to this type of event, we’ll take fashion over flashin’ anytime.

    Look for ongoing Fashion Week coverage on our Style Council blog at blogs.laweekly.com/style_council/.

    Last Updated ( Thursday, 19 October 2006 )
    Best regards,

    Jake
    [B]Less talk, more monkey![/B]

  2. #2
    Join Date
    28th January 04
    Location
    Finger Lakes, New York
    Posts
    361
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wow. Even for a fashion article, that was damned lazy. She pretty obviously wrote it before the event, then stuck in proper names. And I'll bet you she wore pants while doing it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    5th September 05
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    5,144
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You know, they say that any ink is good ink but this lady spent entirely too much time getting cute about regimentality...this "the question" stuff is getting way overdone and is beginning to get annoying.

    Best

    AA

  4. #4
    Join Date
    9th June 06
    Location
    Midland, TX
    Posts
    4,655
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yep, that was grade-A pure SLOP! I simply skimmed the last half of it... so as not to fall asleep. Ugh.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    15th September 05
    Location
    Outside Boston
    Posts
    526
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Agreed, too bad they don.t contact our forum mods here before this event to get things sraight. They Certainly could send them to the right Folks to make this type of event well done. Matt N,Hammish, Etc.....
    “Live each season as it passes; breathe the air, taste the fruit, drink the drink, and resign yourself to the influences of each.” H.D. Thoreau

  6. #6
    Join Date
    3rd October 05
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    69
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Comment!

    I did in my own self-righteous way. Don't think they publish them, although I sent one.

    http://blogs.laweekly.com/style_council/mad-for-plaid/

    While it may seem funny to be "regimental" I think it in poor taste to trivialize the kilt with trite and simplistic observational skills at this level. Sorry, the kilt is not the fashion item you deem it to be. Those men didn't attend to flash their "bits" for your amusement. The kilt has a culture, history and a people behind it. Men have fought, lived and died in them.

    How appropriate would it be to inquire about what's under a lady's skirt at this function by a man? Sorry, it's not about being "Regimental" for the benefit of giddy fashion observer.

    If you were covering recreational wear, like bikinis, it would be appropriate. Until such time a full brigade of bikini clad woman charge a hill with fixed bayonets, this too would cease to be funny.

    Then again, what can I truly expect from a "fashion" blog anyway? Lina, you did a disservice by focusing on what's under the kilt, but not what is in the kilt and what it means to people. Now that you are sufficiently aware of the fact men do go regimental, I hope the coverage of the next event would be what the first should have been:

    Respectful.
    Last edited by ian; 20th October 06 at 01:14 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    9th June 06
    Location
    Midland, TX
    Posts
    4,655
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ian
    I did in my own self-righteous way. Don't think they publish them, although I sent one.


    While it may seem funny to be "regimental" I think it in poor taste to trivialize the kilt with trite and simplistic observational skills at this level. Sorry, the kilt is not the fashion item you deem it to be. Those men didn't attend to flash their "bits" for your amusement. The kilt has a culture, history and a people behind it. Men have fought, lived and died in them.

    How appropriate would it be to inquire about what's under a lady's skirt at this function by a man? Sorry, it's not about being "Regimental" for the benefit of giddy fashion observer.

    If you were covering recreational wear, like bikinis, it would be appropriate. Until such time a full brigade of bikini clad woman charge a hill with fixed bayonets, this too would cease to be funny.

    Then again, what can I truly expect from a "fashion" blog anyway? Lina, you did a disservice by focusing on what's under the kilt, but not what is in the kilt and what it means to people. Now that you are sufficiently aware of the fact men do go regimental, I hope the coverage of the next event would be what the first should have been:

    Respectful.
    Very well put.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0