X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
30th November 06, 09:17 AM
#1
I think I am right in saying that once it is sealed up in a bottle, there is no further development of the whisky (well maybe a very slow deterioration over a long time). I can see the sense of paying premium prices for a malt that has been carefully aged in sherry/port/or whatever barrels for a substantial number of years before being bottled because that should develop interesting complexities in the flavour. But I don't see the sense in paying huge prices for a whisky that might well have been poured into its bottle within five years of its distillation just because the bottle is old. I might taste it out of curiousity (not much change of that, of course) but I wouldn't expect it to be exceptional.
-
Similar Threads
-
By cessna152towser in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 18
Last Post: 4th January 07, 08:07 AM
-
By Kilted KT in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 20
Last Post: 1st December 06, 07:51 AM
-
By Graham in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 9
Last Post: 30th November 06, 10:03 AM
-
By Big Paul in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 34
Last Post: 30th November 06, 09:51 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks