Quote Originally Posted by Dreadbelly View Post
Yes they did. With red hair and fair skin. (Well, some had red hair)

Those mummies also caused a hell of a lot of controversy because they are over 10,000 years old. Or so the claim. I don't have a clue how old they really are.

Speaking of 10,000 year old objects, the pyramids are a lot older than previously thought. There are three star gazing holes in the sides of one of the pyramids at Giza that they just found not to long ago. These three holes should align with Orion's belt in the sky, but the earth has shifted orbit and the African plate has drifted a bit, so the alignment is no longer perfect. The alignment would have been perfect about 10,000 to 15,000 years ago. Human beings and civilisations are much older than we realise. We are a species with severe amnesia, there is a massive chunk of time and high civilisation that we can't seem to account for, a period where we fell backwards, and then the long slow climb back to civilisation bringing us to where we are now.

Those mummies found in China are another piece of the puzzle. There are things about them that just don't fit in, and items they had that were far more advanced than what they should have.

As an archaeologist, I have to take this with a grain of salt. Just because a hole in a pyramid aligns with Orien 10,000 years ago does not mean that is when they were built. There is no other evidence the pyramids in Egypt, or anywhere else for that matter, are over 5,000 y.a.

Currently, I am working on cataloging stone tools that were used approx. 25,000 BCE by the last of the neandertals. They were still competitors of Homo sapiens back then, and sapiens did not overpower them until about 22,000 BCE. It wasn't until 7,000 BCE that people began to form even the most basic states and civilizations.