X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
15th March 07, 01:24 PM
#19
 Originally Posted by Weasel Mender
Yesterday the UK workman came out with the "modesty closure" engaged, his reaction, "I said shorts not kilts", I pulled the apron to prove the UK workman was "bifircated" and got the reply "That's really splitting hairs now I see why you made me agree to a precise definition,you win".
Congratulations I guess, but I am unsure how this is a dress code victory for kilts. If you undo the snaps on your Workman or wear a traditional kilt tomorrow you are in violation of the "precise" wording of the new policy and if you keep the snaps done the garment is bifurcated and therefor specifically not a kilt but a strange pair of shorts. I'm happy, for you, that you get to wear the garment though.
-
Similar Threads
-
By Riverkilt in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 19
Last Post: 9th November 06, 08:58 AM
-
By RockyR in forum USA Kilts
Replies: 8
Last Post: 13th February 05, 05:34 AM
-
By Clan Ewan in forum USA Kilts
Replies: 10
Last Post: 29th June 04, 12:28 PM
-
By Clan Ewan in forum USA Kilts
Replies: 19
Last Post: 26th June 04, 05:03 AM
-
By highlandtide in forum Contemporary Kilt Wear
Replies: 8
Last Post: 27th February 04, 09:59 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks