|
-
10th June 07, 01:23 PM
#1
Likewise! It's all about clan for me too. I absolutely love the weathered MacKenzie, but even though I have a good mate who is a Seaforth Mackenzie, I couldn't even bring myself to wear it to honour him. I cant even bring myself to wear the wife's Johnston, & that only differs from my own in the positioning of the black stripes. That is not to belittle these tartans in any way shape or form, just that I personally need the clan connection for it to work for me.
-
-
11th June 07, 03:00 AM
#2
Apologies if you've seen this before but here is an interesting article which clarifies a few myths about kilt-wearing and tartan entitlement.
http://thecapitalscot.com/pastfeatures/kiltstuf.html
It is only a piece of cloth after all.
-
-
11th June 07, 03:43 AM
#3
 Originally Posted by Phil
Phil,
Agreed, tartan is only a piece of cloth -- but for some, that cloth has personal meaning. Different horses for courses and all that. 
Regards,
Todd
-
-
11th June 07, 04:19 AM
#4
FWIW, I kind of agree with you. The argument that anyone wearing my clan's tartan should be taken as them honoring it just doesn't hold water. Case in point I saw a gent wearing ancient Boyd at a games last year and being so inclined I approached him because I don't see it worn that often. It turned out he wasn't even sure what tartan it was and "just liked the colors" that doesn't seem to honor much of anything to be honest.
Also, whoever is was that brought up Beloit's age, that's poor form and such an easy way out of an argument, discredit by age discrimination. Tsk.
So anyway, while I don't care for the practice personally I can't and wouldn't stop anyone from doing so.
-
-
11th June 07, 04:26 AM
#5
 Originally Posted by cajunscot
Phil,
Agreed, tartan is only a piece of cloth -- but for some, that cloth has personal meaning. Different horses for courses and all that.
Regards,
Todd
I didn't mean to belittle anybody's feelings of attachment to what they regard as their heritage but to encapsulate all of this in a length of material to the exclusion of others simply on the strength of a name is something I disagree with. How can such exclusivity as posted here come to terms with walking on a carpet in your tartan or sitting on a rug in your tartan? The tartans I wear are Galbraith through family but also Lindsay because I inherited it from my in-laws and know they would be proud I choose to wear it even though I have no claim to any connection with that clan.
-
-
11th June 07, 04:42 AM
#6
 Originally Posted by Phil
I didn't mean to belittle anybody's feelings of attachment to what they regard as their heritage but to encapsulate all of this in a length of material to the exclusion of others simply on the strength of a name is something I disagree with. How can such exclusivity as posted here come to terms with walking on a carpet in your tartan or sitting on a rug in your tartan? The tartans I wear are Galbraith through family but also Lindsay because I inherited it from my in-laws and know they would be proud I choose to wear it even though I have no claim to any connection with that clan.
Phil,
I would never tell anyone wearing the Cumming tartan who wasn't a Cumming by "blood, ring or backdoor" that they were wrong in wearing it. That would be rude and ungentlemanly. If someone wants to wear it, then great! I would never dream of excluding anyone.
My point was that personally, I only wear tartans I have some connection to. I can't worry about others wear, only myself. Those are standards I uphold myself to, and myself only.
And I would argue, btw, that you do have a connection to Lindsey through your in-laws. 
Regards,
Todd
-
-
11th June 07, 02:36 PM
#7
I still think that it's cool when someone thinks that the tartan that I wear for reasons of my own which have nothing to do with what it looks like are wearing it just because they like the colors. I'm not all that keen on their colors but I'm attached to them for reasons of my own. It is nice that someone, like a couple of members here, like the way that the Montgomery tartan looks. It makes me tend to reassess my rather harsh judgement on how it looks. I wear it anyway as it shows what clan I belong to, just as I'm very proud to wear the light blue Infantry cord on my class A uniform.
-
-
12th June 07, 06:25 AM
#8
I can't believe this argument still goes on. I'm also amazed that there are so many long time members of this board who still whine over others wearing their tartan. There is quite a bit of hypocracy in the kilt world. Everyone should wear a kilt, but it better not be my clan tartan. So, what is it going to be? Are we going to include people, or exclude people?
Here is the way it is; There are no rules governing who can wear what tartan. If the tartan is available from a mill, and delivered to your kilt maker you [B]can[B] wear it. Maybe you wish others wouldn't wear your clan's tartan if they've no connection to it, but they can. So get over it!
-
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks