X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 230

Thread: Allowed tartans

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Raptor
    Likewise! It's all about clan for me too. I absolutely love the weathered MacKenzie, but even though I have a good mate who is a Seaforth Mackenzie, I couldn't even bring myself to wear it to honour him. I cant even bring myself to wear the wife's Johnston, & that only differs from my own in the positioning of the black stripes. That is not to belittle these tartans in any way shape or form, just that I personally need the clan connection for it to work for me.

  2. #2
    Phil is offline Membership Revoked for repeated rule violations.
    Join Date
    13th March 07
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    2,407
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Apologies if you've seen this before but here is an interesting article which clarifies a few myths about kilt-wearing and tartan entitlement.

    http://thecapitalscot.com/pastfeatures/kiltstuf.html

    It is only a piece of cloth after all.

  3. #3
    macwilkin is offline
    Retired Forum Moderator
    Forum Historian

    Join Date
    22nd June 04
    Posts
    9,938
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil View Post
    Apologies if you've seen this before but here is an interesting article which clarifies a few myths about kilt-wearing and tartan entitlement.

    http://thecapitalscot.com/pastfeatures/kiltstuf.html

    It is only a piece of cloth after all.
    Phil,

    Agreed, tartan is only a piece of cloth -- but for some, that cloth has personal meaning. Different horses for courses and all that.

    Regards,

    Todd

  4. #4
    Join Date
    4th November 06
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    152
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    FWIW, I kind of agree with you. The argument that anyone wearing my clan's tartan should be taken as them honoring it just doesn't hold water. Case in point I saw a gent wearing ancient Boyd at a games last year and being so inclined I approached him because I don't see it worn that often. It turned out he wasn't even sure what tartan it was and "just liked the colors" that doesn't seem to honor much of anything to be honest.

    Also, whoever is was that brought up Beloit's age, that's poor form and such an easy way out of an argument, discredit by age discrimination. Tsk.

    So anyway, while I don't care for the practice personally I can't and wouldn't stop anyone from doing so.

  5. #5
    Phil is offline Membership Revoked for repeated rule violations.
    Join Date
    13th March 07
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    2,407
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cajunscot View Post
    Phil,

    Agreed, tartan is only a piece of cloth -- but for some, that cloth has personal meaning. Different horses for courses and all that.

    Regards,

    Todd
    I didn't mean to belittle anybody's feelings of attachment to what they regard as their heritage but to encapsulate all of this in a length of material to the exclusion of others simply on the strength of a name is something I disagree with. How can such exclusivity as posted here come to terms with walking on a carpet in your tartan or sitting on a rug in your tartan? The tartans I wear are Galbraith through family but also Lindsay because I inherited it from my in-laws and know they would be proud I choose to wear it even though I have no claim to any connection with that clan.

  6. #6
    macwilkin is offline
    Retired Forum Moderator
    Forum Historian

    Join Date
    22nd June 04
    Posts
    9,938
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil View Post
    I didn't mean to belittle anybody's feelings of attachment to what they regard as their heritage but to encapsulate all of this in a length of material to the exclusion of others simply on the strength of a name is something I disagree with. How can such exclusivity as posted here come to terms with walking on a carpet in your tartan or sitting on a rug in your tartan? The tartans I wear are Galbraith through family but also Lindsay because I inherited it from my in-laws and know they would be proud I choose to wear it even though I have no claim to any connection with that clan.

    Phil,

    I would never tell anyone wearing the Cumming tartan who wasn't a Cumming by "blood, ring or backdoor" that they were wrong in wearing it. That would be rude and ungentlemanly. If someone wants to wear it, then great! I would never dream of excluding anyone.

    My point was that personally, I only wear tartans I have some connection to. I can't worry about others wear, only myself. Those are standards I uphold myself to, and myself only.

    And I would argue, btw, that you do have a connection to Lindsey through your in-laws.

    Regards,

    Todd

  7. #7
    Join Date
    4th June 07
    Location
    Canby, Oregon
    Posts
    131
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I still think that it's cool when someone thinks that the tartan that I wear for reasons of my own which have nothing to do with what it looks like are wearing it just because they like the colors. I'm not all that keen on their colors but I'm attached to them for reasons of my own. It is nice that someone, like a couple of members here, like the way that the Montgomery tartan looks. It makes me tend to reassess my rather harsh judgement on how it looks. I wear it anyway as it shows what clan I belong to, just as I'm very proud to wear the light blue Infantry cord on my class A uniform.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    28th February 06
    Location
    Boston, Ma
    Posts
    436
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I can't believe this argument still goes on. I'm also amazed that there are so many long time members of this board who still whine over others wearing their tartan. There is quite a bit of hypocracy in the kilt world. Everyone should wear a kilt, but it better not be my clan tartan. So, what is it going to be? Are we going to include people, or exclude people?

    Here is the way it is; There are no rules governing who can wear what tartan. If the tartan is available from a mill, and delivered to your kilt maker you [B]can[B] wear it. Maybe you wish others wouldn't wear your clan's tartan if they've no connection to it, but they can. So get over it!

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0